| Course Code | Class Code |
| ECS-501 | ECS-501-O501 | Evaluating Lesson Plans | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: No submission (0.00%) | 2: Insufficient (69.00%) | 3: Approaching (74.00%) | 4: Acceptable (87.00%) | 5: Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Category | 100.0% |
| Learning Targets/Objectives | 15.0% | Not addressed. | At least one of the lesson plans is poorly evaluated in terms of how well the learning targets/objectives align with the national/state learning standards; or more than one of the statements regarding how well the learning targets/objectives are inaccurate or significantly underdeveloped. | At least one of the lesson plans could be more adequately evaluated in terms of how well the learning targets/objectives align with the national/state learning standards; or at least one of the statements regarding how well the learning targets/objectives are written requires further development. | Each lesson plan is adequately evaluated in terms of how well the learning targets/objectives align with the national/state learning standards. A statement regarding how well the learning targets/objectives are written is included for each of the lessons. | Each lesson plan is appropriately evaluated in terms of how well the learning targets/objectives align with the national/state learning standards. An insightful statement regarding how well the learning targets/objectives are written is included for each of the lessons. |
| Learning Activities | 15.0% | Not addressed. | At least one of the lesson plans is poorly evaluated in terms of how well the learning activities align with the learning targets/objectives standards; or more than one of statements regarding how engaging or developmentally appropriate the learning activities is inaccurate or significantly underdeveloped. | At least one of the lesson plans could be more adequately evaluated in terms of how well the learning activities align with the learning targets/objectives standards; or at least one statement regarding how engaging or developmentally appropriate the learning activities requires further development. | Each lesson plan is adequately evaluated in terms of how well the learning activities align with the learning targets/objectives standards. A statement is included regarding how engaging and developmentally appropriate the learning activities are for each of the lessons. | Each lesson plan is appropriately evaluated in terms of how well the learning activities align with the learning targets/objectives standards. An insightful statement is included regarding how engaging and developmentally appropriate the learning activities are for each of the lessons. |
| Differentiation | 10.0% | Not addressed. | At least one of the lesson plans is poorly evaluated in terms of whether there is sufficient differentiation to meet the learning needs of the intended students. | At least one of the lesson plans could be more adequately evaluated in terms of whether there is sufficient differentiation to meet the learning needs of the intended students. | Each lesson plan is adequately evaluated in terms of whether there is sufficient differentiation to meet the learning needs of the intended students. | Each lesson plan is appropriately evaluated in terms of whether there is sufficient differentiation to meet the learning needs of the intended students. |
| Justification [CEC S3.2; NAEYC 1a, 4c, 4d, 5c; InTASC 2(g), 2(h), 7(i)] | 30.0% | Not addressed. | The justification, based on the findings, regarding which lesson plan would be more effective for meeting the learning needs of early childhood and special education students is presented poorly. | The justification, based on the findings, regarding which lesson plan would be more effective for meeting the learning needs of early childhood and special education students requires further development. | Includes adequate justification, based on the findings, regarding which lesson plan would be more effective for meeting the learning needs of early childhood and special education students. | Includes appropriate justification, based on the findings, regarding which lesson plan would be more effective for meeting the learning needs of early childhood and special education students. |
| Organization | 10.0% | Not addressed. | An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other. | The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. | The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. | The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. |
| Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
rnixon@123
Rubric21.xlsx
