Assignment 5

HEA 530 Milestone Two Draft of Data Presentation Guidelines and Rubric

It is essential you read the documents and follow the guidelines below to successfully complete the assignment.

Overview: This assignment represents the next step of your final project. Once you review the data set below, refer to the assignment guidelines below Once you submit your milestone upload your draft to the Module Four 6 -1 Discussion: Draft of Data Presentation for peer feedback in the next module.

Pre-Assignment: The following data set will be needed to complete this assignment:

 Data Table

The following documents provide transcripts of hypothetical interviews conducted to provide rationale for the data being used in this milestone:

 Interview With the Director

 Interview With the Associate Director

 Interview With the Supervisor of Student Interns

Assignment Guidelines

Data preparation of the information used to evaluate your program

 Analyze your data collection process. Which existing sources inform your program? What additional or new data sources did you tap for your

evaluation? Why did you select these sources to inform your evaluation? What other information would help explain your process?

 Summarize and display your data in a standard and meaningful manner. 1. Create both numerical and graphic representations of the data collected. 2. Merge the program data collected, illustrating the planned versus actual results with appropriate presentation graphics.

Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Your submission must contain graphs as appropriate for presentation materials. Completion of this draft and the peer review in the next module will inform your final project submission.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Data Preparation: Collection Process

Meets “Proficient” criteria, and details and examples demonstrate a broad range of data sources and processes

Analyzes the data collection process, explaining why the sources are appropriate

Discusses the data collection process, but lacks detail in explaining why the sources are appropriate

Does not discuss the data collection process

30

Data Preparation: Summarize and

Display 1

Meets “Proficient” criteria, and representations illustrate insight into the data collected

Creates detailed numerical and graphic representations of the data collected

Creates cursory numerical or graphic representations of the data collected

Does not create numerical and graphic representations of the data collected

30

Data Preparation: Summarize and

Display 2

Meets “Proficient” criteria, and details and examples demonstrate facility with data presentation through the effective use of graphs, charts, and tables

Merges the program data collected, illustrating the planned vs. actual program results with appropriate presentation graphics

Merges the data illustrating the planned vs. actual program results, but use of presentation graphics is not appropriate

Does not present the data illustrating the planned vs. actual program results

30

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

10

Total 100%