Foundations and Essentials for the Doctor of Nursing Practice

profileTinacherry100$
Rubric2.docx

NURS-8002C

NURS_8002_Module2_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8002_Module2_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the 3 AACN DNP Essentials that most align to the completion of a Doctoral Project. Be specific.

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and clearly describes in detail 3 AACN DNP Essentials that most align to the completion of a Doctoral Project. ... The response provides accurate and specific details that fully support the selection of the 3 AACN DNP Essentials described.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately describes 3 AACN DNP Essentials that most align to the completion of a Doctoral Project. ... The response provides accurate details that support the selection of the 3 AACN DNP Essentials described.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes 3 AACN DNP Essentials that most algin to the completion of a Doctoral Project. ... OR ... The response describes < 3 AACN DNP Essentials. ... The response provides inaccurate or vague details that may support the selection of the AACN DNP Essentials described.

31 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes 3 AACN DNP Essentials that most align to the completion of a Doctoral Project, or it is missing. ... The response provides inaccurate and vague details that do not support the selection of the AACN DNP Essentials described, or it is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how the AACN DNP Essentials will relate to the completion of a practicum/field experience. Be specific.

40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and clearly describes in detail how the AACN DNP Essentials will relate to the completion of a practicum/field experience. ... The response provides accurate and specific details that fully support the relationship between the AACN DNP Essentials and a practicum/field experience.

35 to >31.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately describes how the AACN DNP Essentials will relate to the completion of a practicum/field experience. ... The response provides accurate details that support the relationship between the AACN DNP Essentials and a practicum/field experience.

31 to >27.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how the AACN DNP Essentials will relate to the completion of a practicum/field experience. ... The response provides inaccurate or vague details that may support the relationship between the AACN DNP Essentials and a practicum/field experience.

27 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how the AACN DNP Essentials will relate to the completion of a practicum/field experience, or it is missing. ... The response provides inaccurate and vague details that do not support the relationship between the AACN DNP Essentials and a practicum/field experience, or it is missing.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous Next