revised paper (in three hours)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWell-developed argument and/or concrete analysis and/or coherent opinion: Reflective essay responses with details that demonstrate student has read (or watched) and understood materials. References to the material (quotes, etc.) are included in response.

This was supposed to be a comparison between the Sermon on the Mount, which we went over in class ( https://marymount.instructure.com/courses/10224/files/408626?module_item_id=132327 ) and the Omelas story.

0 / 2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting: Calibri 11 pt font, double-spacing. Answer sheet utilized. Expected length is 2 ENTIRE pages, maximum and minimum. Use universal language (e.g. “humankind” not “mankind”).

Good work.

2 / 2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical apparatus: In-text citations for sacred texts. Chicago Manual of Style footnotes and bibliography for all other types of text if specified in Assignment Sheet.

CMS does not allow in-text citations.

1 / 2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling, grammar, punctuation: Corrections will be made in Canvas. If you cannot see either these corrections, or any of my comments, contact IT for help.

Negligible error.

2 / 2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAesthetic of language, presentation and ideas: If you wish to include any image, cut and paste the url of the website where you found it, and paste this into your footnotes.

I'm going to give you the 2 points, because, even though you didn't complete the assignment per instructions, you made a lot of great points throughout.

2 / 2.0 pts

Total Points: 7