research assignment
ENN
rubric1.docx
|
|
Exemplary Demonstration
|
Proficient Demonstration
|
Developing Demonstration
|
Beginning Demonstration |
|
Impact on Mental Health regarding Medical Issues on Service Member and Family
25 points |
Expectations are exceeded significantly about impact: a high degree of competence is demonstrated, responds creatively, would require little or no changes
22-25 points |
Expectations are met about impact: a satisfactory degree of competence is demonstrated, responds competently, would require limited changes
19-21 points |
Expectations are partially met about impact: a limited degree of competence demonstrated, responds incompletely, would require changes in several areas.
12-18 points |
Expectations are not met in this area: minimal or no competence demonstrated, responds inadequately, would require extensive changes
0-11 points |
|
Description of evidence based practices and use
25 points |
Assignment addressed each EBP area of the question with added information about the subject matter.
22-25 points
|
Assignment addressed most of each EBP area of the question .
19-21 points |
Assignment addressed some EBP areas of the question.
12- 18 points |
Assignment addressed none of the components (or none) in the question.
0-11 points |
|
APA Formatting Writing Consent Form signed Two academic resources per issue
10 points |
No errors in APA formatting. Scholarly style. At least two academic references used per issue. Writing is flowing and easy to follow. The assignment consistently models the language and conventions used in scholarly/ professional literature appropriate to the student’s discipline and is error-free. The Assignment would meet the guidelines for submission for publication in a peer reviewed scholarly journal in the student's field of study. APA formatting is error-free.
9- 10 points
|
Errors in APA style are occasional. At least one reference used. Two resources per issue but not all were academic. The style and format (APA) are broadly followed, but inconsistencies are apparent. There is selection of less suitable scholarly sources (non-peer reviewed literature, excessive use web information). Weak transitions and apparent logic gaps occur between topics being addressed. The style may be difficult to follow so as to detract from the comprehensibility of the Assignment.
7-8 points
|
Errors in APA style are noticeable. Not enough references or lack of complete references. Word choice occasionally informal in tone. Writing has a few awkward or unclear passages. While some educational conventions are followed, others are not. Assignment lacks consistency of style and no evidence of the use of APA in formatting. It may be unclear which references are direct quotes and which are paraphrased. Based on the information provided, the reader would have some difficulty referring back to cited sources. Significant revisions would contribute to the comprehensibility of the assignment.
4-6 points |
Errors in APA style detract substantially from the assignment. No references Word choice is informal in tone. Writing is choppy, with many awkward or unclear passages. The stylistic conventions of scholarly writing are not followed. Fails to demonstrate thoroughness and competence in documentation. Inappropriate style and format make reading and comprehensibility problematic. Please seek help from the writing center.
0-3 points |
|
Military Integration
15 points |
Assignment consistently used appropriate military terms and concepts while adding information about military culture
14-15 points |
Assignment used appropriate military terms and concepts
12-13 points |
Assignment minimally used appropriate military terms and concepts
8-11 points |
Assignment did not used appropriate military terms and concepts
0-7 points
|
