Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

·

Complete Part 1 of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template. Be sure to address the following: ·   Identify at least two academic and at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 32 (32%) - 35 (35%)

The response clearly and accurately identifies at least two academic individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse. The response clearly and accurately identifies at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

Good 28 (28%) - 31 (31%)

The response partially identifies at least two academic individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse. The response partially identifies at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as practicing nurse.

Fair 25 (25%) - 27 (27%)

The response identifies only one academic individual or team to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse. The response identifies only one professional individual or team to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

Poor 0 (0%) - 24 (24%)

The response identifying at least two academic individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response identifying at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Feedback:

·   Explain why these individuals and/or teams were selected and how they will support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 45 (45%) - 50 (50%)

Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse. Response clearly and accurately explains how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

Good 40 (40%) - 44 (44%)

Response explains why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse. Response explains how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

Fair 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)

Explanation of why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse is vague or inaccurate.

Poor 0 (0%) - 34 (34%)

Explanation of why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting:- The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

%7B%220.280000

%7B%220.250000

%7B%220.000000

%7B%220.450000

%7B%220.400000

%7B%220.350000

%7B%220.050000

%7B%220.040000

%7B%220.035000

%7B%220.320000