|
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
|
50.0 to >40.0 pts
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of human lifespan development; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
|
|
50.0 to >40.0 pts
The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
|
|
50.0 to >40.0 pts
Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications regarding human lifespan development.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
|
|
30.0 to >24.0 pts
Cites and integrates three or more credible sources.
|
24.0 to >18.0 pts
Cites and integrates two credible sources.
|
18.0 to >12.0 pts
Cites and integrates only one credible source.
|
12.0 to >0 pts
Cites and integrates no credible sources.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material
|
|
50.0 to >40.0 pts
Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
|
|
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.
|
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.
|
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.
|
8.0 to >0 pts
Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style
|
|
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.
|
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.
|
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.
|
8.0 to >0 pts
Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
|
|
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Project contains proper APA formatting, with no more than one significant error.
|
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Few errors in APA formatting, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Significant errors in APA formatting, with four to five significant errors.
|
8.0 to >0 pts
Numerous errors in APA formatting, with more than five significant errors.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
|
|
60.0 to >48.0 pts
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in human lifespan development.
|
48.0 to >36.0 pts
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
|
36.0 to >24.0 pts
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
|
24.0 to >0 pts
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.
|
|
60.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 350.0
|
PinkPantherGurl
Rubric1.docx
