| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| PSY-838 | PSY-838-O500 | Benchmark - Personality Assessments | 242.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Critically Evaluate Two Personality Inventories | 15.0% | Critical evaluation of two personality inventories is either missing or is not evident to the reader. | Critical evaluation of two personality inventories is present, but is incomplete | Critical evaluation of two personality inventories is present, but the evaluation is cursory and lacking in depth. | Critical evaluation of two personality inventories is present. Evaluation is detailed and includes most of the necessary elements. | Critical evaluation of two personality inventories is present. Evaluation is thorough with rich detail and includes all necessary elements. Synthesis of sources is present. |
| Develop an Empirical Examination of Theoretical Foundations for Each Inventory | 15.0% | An empirical evaluation of the theoretical foundations for each inventory is either missing or not evident to the reader. | An empirical evaluation of the theoretical foundations for each inventory is present, but is incomplete. | An empirical evaluation of the theoretical foundations for each inventory is present, but the sources may not be current. | An empirical evaluation of the theoretical foundations for each inventory is present and mostly complete and sources are mostly current. | An empirical evaluation of the theoretical foundations for each inventory is present and thoroughly developed. Synthesis of sources is present and current. |
| Assess Each Personality Inventory for Reliability and Validity | 15.0% | An assessment of each personality inventory is either missing or not evident to the reader. | An assessment of each personality inventory is present but incomplete. | An assessment of each personality inventory is present but details are cursory. | An assessment of each personality inventory is present. A discussion of the reliability and validity of the inventories are detailed. | An assessment of each personality inventory is present. A discussion of the reliability and validity of the inventories are thoroughly discussed. Synthesis of sources is present. |
| Evaluate the Applied Use as Well as Multicultural Use of Each Inventory (4.5) | 15.0% | An evaluation of the applied use and multicultural use of each inventory is either missing or not evident to the reader. | An evaluation of the applied use and multicultural use of each inventory is present. Discussion is incomplete. | An evaluation of the applied use and multicultural use of each inventory is present. Discussion is done in a cursory manner. | An evaluation of the applied use and multicultural use of each inventory is present. Discussion is detailed. | An evaluation of the applied use and multicultural use of each inventory is present. Discussion is in depth and detailed. Synthesis of sources is present. |
| Evaluate the Impact Personality Assessment has for the Individual and Group to Improve Organizational Performance (4.3) | 10.0% | Evaluation of the impact of personality assessment on the individual and group for improving organizational performance is either missing or not evident to the reader. | Evaluation of the impact of personality assessment on the individual and group for improving organizational performance is present. Discussion is incomplete. | Evaluation of the impact of personality assessment on the individual and group for improving organizational performance is present. Discussion is done in a cursory manner. | Evaluation of the impact of personality assessment on the individual and group for improving organizational performance is present. Discussion is detailed. | Evaluation of the impact of personality assessment on the individual and group for improving organizational performance is present. Discussion is in depth and detailed. Synthesis of sources is present. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 20.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Mechanics of Writing | 5.0% | Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| APA Format | 5.0% | Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used. | Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. | Required format is used correctly, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. | Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. | The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
iabepdadm
RUBRIC.xlsx
