| Course Code | Class Code |
| EDU-525 | EDU-525-O500 | Professional Teaching Standards | 75.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Category | 100.0% |
| Two InTASC Themes | 20.0% | Not addressed. | At least one of the two InTASC themes is not summarized accurately. | At least one of the two InTASC themes could be summarized more adequately or accurately. | Includes an adequate summary of at least two themes that exist within the InTASC standards. | Includes an insightful summary of at least two themes that exist within the InTASC standards. |
| Standard and Theme | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Includes a statement that does not accurately relate an InTASC standard with a theme. | Includes a statement that could more accurately relate an InTASC standard with a theme. | Includes a statement that adequately relates an InTASC standard with a theme. | Includes a statement that creatively and accurately relates an InTASC standard with a theme. |
| Collaboration | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Includes a statement that does not adequately express how teachers can work collaboratively with others to use a variety of data and information to meet the learning needs of students. | Includes a statement that could more adequately express how teachers can work collaboratively with others to use a variety of data and information to meet the learning needs of students. | Includes a statement that adequately expresses how teachers can work collaboratively with others to use a variety of data and information to meet the learning needs of students. | Includes a statement that thoughtfully expresses how teachers can work collaboratively with others to use a variety of data and information to meet the learning needs of students. |
| Organization | 10.0% | Not addressed. | An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. | The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. | The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. | The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and the audience is provided with a clear sense of the main idea. |
| Research Citations and Format | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. | Some citations may be missing where needed; or some of the sources do not support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken. | All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. | All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. |
| Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
kcurry90
Rubric.xlsx
