Essay
Rubric for Evaluation of Written Submissions
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Wtg |
|
Professional Appearance Expectations
|
Unprofessional appearance and/or missing three or more of required elements |
Adequate professional appearance but missing two required elements |
Standard professional appearance but missing one required element |
Excellent professional appearance and meets expectations |
Exceeds professional expectations as outlined by instructor |
/5
|
|
Introduction |
Fails to identify purpose and process and lacks direction and focus
|
Vaguely identifies purpose and process with limited overview of information |
Adequate coverage of topic and brief overview of information |
Effectively introduces topic and provides appropriate overview of information with direction and focus of key ideas |
Provides excellent overview of information Clearly identifies purpose and provides with direction and focus of key ideas |
/5 |
|
Body |
Minimal coverage of key ideas with major gaps in support and logic
|
Adequate coverage of key ideas with major gaps in logic and coverage |
Evidence of analysis of key ideas with minor gaps in logic and coverage |
Main ideas and factors are clearly identified and developed with key ideas supported with logic and adequate coverage. |
Effectively identifies and analyzes key factors. Provides in-depth and comprehensive coverage of all areas. Ideas are developed and supported with detail to achieve the intended purpose of the communication. Demonstrates ability to synthesize ideas. |
/15 |
|
Conclusion Recommendations |
Vague consolidation of facts and information Lack of logic and support for recommendations and/or conclusions
|
Evidence of consolidation of facts and information Recommendations and/or conclusions lack support in body |
Acceptable consolidation of facts and information Logical and well supported recommendations and/or conclusions |
Good consolidation of facts and information Logical and well supported recommendations and/or conclusions |
Excellent consolidation of facts and information Logical and well supported recommendations and/or conclusions |
/5 |
|
Research Documentation Support |
Ineffective incorporation of information and evidence of research and consolidation Minor errors in sourcing and documentation |
Acceptable incorporation of information and evidence of research and consolidation Minor errors in sourcing and documentation |
Acceptable incorporation of information and evidence of research and consolidation of ideas properly sourced and documented. |
Good incorporation of information and evidence of research and consolidation of ideas properly sourced and documented. |
Excellent incorporation of information and evidence of research and consolidation of ideas properly sourced and documented. |
/10 |
|
Logic and Flow of Information |
No consolidation and flow of ideas. No use of transitions and consolidations |
Limited consolidation and flow of ideas. Minimal use of transitions and consolidations |
Adequate consolidation and flow of ideas. Average use of transitions and consolidations |
Effective consolidation and flow of ideas. Good use of transitions and consolidations |
Information flows logically and excellent use of transitions and consolidations. Clearly, concisely, and logically written – well suited for the topic and intended audience. |
/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
/50 |