| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| NUR-590 | NUR-590-O500 | Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project: Framework or Model for Change | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) | 4: Good (92.00%) | 5: Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Selected Model or Framework for Change | 12.0% | The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are not discussed. | The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are incomplete. | The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are summarized. More information or support is needed. | The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. | The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are thoroughly discussed. Rationale or support is provided. |
| Stages for Model or Framework | 13.0% | The stages in the change model or framework are not discussed. | The stages in the change model or framework are only partially discussed. | The stages in the change model or framework are outlined. There are some inaccuracies. More information is needed. | The stages in the change model or framework are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. | The stages in the change model or framework are thoroughly discussed. |
| Application of Model or Framework to Proposed Implementation | 15.0% | Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is omitted. | Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is incomplete. | General application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is outlined. More information is needed. | Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is described. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. | Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is thoroughly described. |
| Concept Map for Model or Framework | 15.0% | A concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is omitted. | The concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is incomplete or inaccurate. The concept map is attached, but not in the Appendix. | A general concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is attached in the Appendix. There are inaccuracies. | A concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is attached in the Appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. | A detailed and accurate concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is attached in the Appendix. |
| Application of Theoretical Framework in Decision Making
(C.1.2) | 10.0% | The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is not demonstrated. | The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is not consistently demonstrated. There are significant gaps and inaccuracies. | The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is generally demonstrated. There are some gaps or inaccuracies. | The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is adequately demonstrated. | The author has clearly demonstrated the ability to effectively apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level. |
| Required Sources | 5.0% | Sources are not included. | Number of required sources is only partially met. | Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. | Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Dtjemrxypyt
Rubric_Week3_Assignment.xlsx
