PLEASE FOLLOW DIRECTIONS CAREFULLY AND PLEASE FOLLOW RUBRIC . I have attached the required articles

3.0 pts

Successfully identified the nursing-sensitive indicators.

2.0 pts

Minor issues with the identification of nursing-sensitive indicators.

1.0 pts

Moderate issues with the identification of nursing-sensitive indicators.

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

3.0 pts

Successfully discussed how nursing-sensitive indicator data can be utilized to enhance safety and quality of patient care.

2.0 pts

Minor issues with how the nursing-sensitive indicators can be utilized to enhance safety and quality of patient care.

1.0 pts

Discussed how nursing-sensitive indicator data can be utilized to enhance safety or quality of patient care (failed to discuss both).

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

3.0 pts

Successfully discussed the relationship between nursing staffing and 2 of the conditions listed.

2.0 pts

Successfully discussed the relationship between nursing staffing and 1 of the conditions listed.

1.0 pts

Successfully discussed 2 of the conditions listed but fails to address the relationship to nurse staffing.

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

3.0 pts

Correctly calculated the number of productive FTEs that would be needed and showed calculations.

2.0 pts

Correctly calculated the number of productive FTEs that would be needed but failed to show calculations.

1.0 pts

Failed to correctly calculate the number of productive FTEs but included calculations to show attempt.

0.0 pts

No attempt to answer question or inappropriate attempt at calculation.

3.0 pts

Successfully explained HPPD and how the acuity of the unit would affect HPPD.

2.0 pts

Minor issues with explaining HPPD and/or how the acuity of the unit would affect HPPD.

1.0 pts

Moderate issues with explaining HPPD and/or how the acuity of the unit would affect HPPD.

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

3.0 pts

Successfully explained how diagnosis related groups (DRG's) and Case Mix Index (CMI) affects hours per patient day.

2.0 pts

Minor issues with explaining how diagnosis related groups (DRG's) and Case Mix Index (CMI) affects hours per patient day.

1.0 pts

Moderate issues with explaining how diagnosis related groups (DRG's) and Case Mix Index (CMI) affects hours per patient day.

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

3.0 pts

Successfully explained outcomes for use in evaluating the staffing plan and recommended changes.

2.0 pts

Minor issues with explaining outcomes for use in evaluating the staffing plan and/or recommended changes.

1.0 pts

Moderate issues with explaining outcomes for use in evaluating the staffing plan and/or recommended changes.

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

3.0 pts

Successfully utilizes 2 scholarly reports to justify the discussion presented in Part I.

2.0 pts

Successfully utilizes 1 scholarly reports to justify the discussion presented in Part I.

1.0 pts

Utilizes 2 resources but not scholarly reports to justify the discussion presented in Part I.

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

3.0 pts

The assignment follows correct APA formatting for title and reference page, including citations. Free of grammar and spelling errors.

2.0 pts

The assignment contains some (2 or less) APA formatting errors for title and reference page, including citations and/or some grammar and spelling errors.

1.0 pts

The assignment contains significant (more than 2) APA formatting for title and reference page, including citations and/or some grammar and spelling errors.

0.0 pts

Severe issues present in paper.