Theory Application Write-up - outline
11/30/21, 6:26 PM Preview Rubric: Theory Application Rubric - PSY235CG0 Human Growth & Developmnt: SS3 (John Lopez) FA21 - CCCOnline
https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_07801853987302734&d2l_nonModalDialog_cbwin=35812782450645e5a4d46c8c8ed0… 1/6
Theory Application Rubric Course: PSY235CG0 Human Growth & Developmnt: SS3 (John Lopez) FA21
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Developing Limited Evidence No Evidence Criterion Score
Content 35 pts / 3535 points
Demonstrates
strong knowledge
of and excellent
comprehension of
the texts and other
sources describing
developmental
theory and stages.
Masterfully applies
knowledge from
sources and
supports the thesis
with clear, relevant
evidence.
Provides an
excellent, thorough
and accurate
explanation of the
chosen
developmental
theory.
Includes brief
28 points
Demonstrates a
good
comprehension of
the texts and other
sources describing
developmental
theory and stages.
Effectively applies
knowledge from
sources and
supports the thesis
with clear, relevant
evidence.
Provides a good,
accurate
explanation of the
chosen
developmental
theory.
Includes brief
descriptions of how
movie excerpts
21 points
Demonstrates
some
comprehension of
texts and other
sources, but
information is
vague or not well-
developed in some
areas.
Supports the thesis
with clear and
relevant evidence.
Provides a good
explanation of the
chosen
developmental
theory, but may be
missing a few key
components.
Includes brief
descriptions of how
movie excerpts
14 points
Demonstrates little
comprehension of
texts and other
sources.
Information is
vague or not well-
developed.
Thesis support is
weak or unclear.
Vaguely
summarizes chosen
developmental
theory with many
key components
missing.
Includes vague
descriptions of how
movie excerpts
illustrate the
Developmental
Processes.
0 points
Demonstrates little
to no
comprehension of
texts or other
sources.
Thesis support is
missing.
Misrepresents
chosen
developmental
theory with
inaccurate
descriptions.
Focuses far too
much on describing
the movie
characters without
connecting to
theory or
developmental
challenges of the
character.
11/30/21, 6:26 PM Preview Rubric: Theory Application Rubric - PSY235CG0 Human Growth & Developmnt: SS3 (John Lopez) FA21 - CCCOnline
https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_07801853987302734&d2l_nonModalDialog_cbwin=35812782450645e5a4d46c8c8ed0… 2/6
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Developing Limited Evidence No Evidence Criterion Score
descriptions of how
movie excerpts
illustrate the
Developmental
Processes.
Detailed
description of the
developmental
challenges and
apparent
resolutions
portrayed by the
character.
illustrate the
Developmental
Processes.
Good description of
the developmental
challenges and
apparent
resolutions
portrayed by the
character.
illustrate the
Developmental
Processes.
Adequate
description of the
developmental
challenges and
apparent
resolutions
portrayed by the
character.
Inadequate
description of the
developmental
challenges and
apparent
resolutions
portrayed by the
character.
11/30/21, 6:26 PM Preview Rubric: Theory Application Rubric - PSY235CG0 Human Growth & Developmnt: SS3 (John Lopez) FA21 - CCCOnline
https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_07801853987302734&d2l_nonModalDialog_cbwin=35812782450645e5a4d46c8c8ed0… 3/6
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Developing Limited Evidence No Evidence Criterion Score
Critical Thinking
and Application
30 pts
/ 3030 points
Provides strong, in-
depth, thought,
insight, and critical
thinking of
developmental
theory and
application of that
theory to movie
character.
Masterfully
analyzes,
synthesizes, and
applies information
effectively from
sources on the
topic, stimulating
additional thought
by making new
inferences or
associations,
offering an
additional source of
relevant
information,
broadening or
bringing more
specificity to the
topic.
24 points
Provides good, in-
depth, thought,
insight, and critical
thinking of
developmental
theory and
application of that
theory to movie
character.
Mostly analyzes,
synthesizes, and
applies information
correctly and
effectively from
sources on the
topic, stimulating
additional thought
by making new
inferences or
associations and
broadening or
bringing more
specificity to the
topic.
18 points
Minor errors,
omissions, or lack
of depth in
thought, insight,
and critical thinking
of developmental
theory and
application of that
theory to movie
character.
Analyzes and
synthesizes some
information
effectively from
sources on the
topic, but is missing
key components.
12 points
Major errors,
omissions, or lack
of depth in
thought, insight,
and critical thinking
of developmental
theory and
application of that
theory to movie
character.
Has difficulty
analyzing and
synthesizing
information
effectively from
sources on the
topic.
0 points
Demonstrates little
thought, insight, or
critical thinking of
developmental
theory and
application of that
theory to movie
character.
Does not analyze,
synthesize
information from
sources on the
topic.
11/30/21, 6:26 PM Preview Rubric: Theory Application Rubric - PSY235CG0 Human Growth & Developmnt: SS3 (John Lopez) FA21 - CCCOnline
https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_07801853987302734&d2l_nonModalDialog_cbwin=35812782450645e5a4d46c8c8ed0… 4/6
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Developing Limited Evidence No Evidence Criterion Score
Word Count 30
pts
/ 30
Application of
Source Material
25pts
/ 25
30 points
Word count is
2,000 words or
more.
24 points
Word count is
between 1,999 and
1,800 words.
18 points
Word count is
between 1,799 and
1,600 words.
12 points
Word count is
between 1,599 and
1,400 words.
0 points
Word count is
between 1,399
and 1,300 words.
25 points
Sources well or
adequately chosen
to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
developmental
issues; source
information is
appropriately
reported in the
paper. Uses five or
more sources from
professional
journals or
websites,
government
websites or books,
three of which are
from peer-
reviewed, scholarly
journals from the
approved list.
20 points
Some significant,
but not major
problems with
selection and
application of
information from
sources reported in
the paper. Uses
four sources from
professional
journals or
websites,
government
websites or books,
two of which are
from peer-
reviewed, scholarly
journals from the
approved list.
15 points
Major problems
with selection and
application of
information from
sources reported in
the paper. Uses
three sources from
professional
journals or
websites,
government
websites or books
and only one is
from a peer-
reviewed, scholarly
journal from the
approved list.
10 points
Source selection is
seriously flawed;
little application of
information from
sources reported in
the paper. Uses two
or less sources
from professional
journals or
websites,
government
websites or books,
none of which are
from peer-
reviewed, scholarly
journals from the
approved list.
0 points
No application of
information from
sources reported in
the paper. Sources
are not from
professional
journals or
websites,
government
websites or books.
11/30/21, 6:26 PM Preview Rubric: Theory Application Rubric - PSY235CG0 Human Growth & Developmnt: SS3 (John Lopez) FA21 - CCCOnline
https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_07801853987302734&d2l_nonModalDialog_cbwin=35812782450645e5a4d46c8c8ed0… 5/6
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Developing Limited Evidence No Evidence Criterion Score
Organization
20pts
/ 20
APA 20pts / 20
20 points
Paper is clearly
organized, well-
written, and
includes four main
sections: an
introduction with a
clear thesis, a main
body with
supporting
evidence, a
conclusion which
summarizes
findings, and
references
16 points
Paper is mostly
organized, well-
written, and
includes four main
sections: an
introduction with a
clear thesis, a main
body with
supporting
evidence, a
conclusion which
summarizes
findings, and
references
12 points
Paper is somewhat
organized, well-
written, and
includes four main
sections: an
introduction with a
thesis, a main body
with supporting
evidence, a
conclusion which
summarizes
findings, and
references
8 points
Paper is not well-
organized or well-
written. Thesis
statement is
unclear.
Organization is
such that it is
difficult to follow.
Omits a conclusion
that summarizes
findings.
0 points
Paper is
disorganized and
extremely difficult
to follow. Thesis
statement is
missing entirely, as
is concluding
paragraph.
20 points
Writing Style is
scientific and
formal without the
use of 1st person
writing. Includes no
APA writing style
and formatting
mistakes in in-text
citations or
references.
16 points
Writing Style is
mostly scientific
and formal without
the use of 1st
person writing.
Includes a few
minor APA writing
style and
formatting mistakes
in in-text citations
and references.
12 points
Writing Style is
generally not
scientific nor
formal. Some
instances of 1st
person writing.
Includes many
minor APA writing
style and
formatting mistakes
of in-text citations
and references.
8 points
Significant errors in
Writing Style that is
not scientific and
utilizes 1st person
writing. Includes
major APA writing
style and
formatting mistakes
in in-text citations
and references.
0 points
APA Writing Style
not present.
Citations and
references missing
or partial.
11/30/21, 6:26 PM Preview Rubric: Theory Application Rubric - PSY235CG0 Human Growth & Developmnt: SS3 (John Lopez) FA21 - CCCOnline
https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_07801853987302734&d2l_nonModalDialog_cbwin=35812782450645e5a4d46c8c8ed0… 6/6
Total / 175
Overall Score
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Developing Limited Evidence No Evidence Criterion Score
Grammar,
Spelling, &
Sentence
Structure 15pts
/ 1515 points
Paper uses
standard English,
characterized by
excellent sentence
and paragraph
structure
No errors in
grammar, spelling
or sentence
structure; clear and
concise wording
with no
unsupported
comments.
12 points
Paper uses
standard English,
characterized by
strong sentence
and paragraph
structure
Only minor errors
in grammar, spelling
or sentence
structure; clear and
concise wording
with no
unsupported
comments.
9 points
Paper uses
standard English,
characterized by
basic sentence and
paragraph
structure
Has some major
errors in grammar,
spelling or sentence
structure; unclear
and rambling
wording with a few
unsupported
comments.
6 points
Writing is
unacceptable with
regard to grammar,
spelling and/or
sentence structure
Poor writing style
that interferes with
clarity.
Some aspects of
paper are not
clearly
understandable
0 points
Writing is
extremely
ungrammatical,
making it difficult
to follow at times.
Most aspects of
paper are not
clearly
understandable
Exemplary 175 points minimum
Proficient 140 points minimum
Developing 105 points minimum
Limited Evidence 70 points minimum
No Evidence 0 points minimum