research
WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY
Course: SEC 6082 Final Research Paper
Instructor: Dirk Sweigart
Student:___________________ Weighted Content:______ CT:______ Comm:______ Weighted Rubric Score:__________
_
|
Performance |
Unsatisfactory 1 |
Developing 2 |
Competent 3 |
Accomplished 4 |
Exemplary 5 |
|
Knowledge of Content
50% of rubric score
|
Work does not reflect the assignment purpose |
Work marginally reflects the assignment purpose |
Work reflects the assignment purpose |
Work is accurately detailed, and in line with course content |
Work stands-out as exemplary, is accurately detailed, and in line with course content |
|
|
Minimal details of ICS Industry being designed |
Overview and description provides only basic information |
Overview and Description provides general information |
Architecture section provides a detailed need and description |
Architecture section provides a clear and concise statement and description |
|
|
Does not include physical, logical, protocols or devices |
Includes a basic overview of physical, logical, protocols or devices |
Includes a general overview of the physical, logical, protocols or devices |
Includes a relatively detailed overview physical, logical, protocols or devices |
Includes a clear and concise overview of the network architecture including detailed description physical, logical, protocols or devices |
|
|
No description of ICS security architecture |
Basic description of ICS security architecture with no details on devices |
Includes a general description of of ICS security architecture but minimal device details |
Includes a relatively detailed description of ICS security architecture along with device details |
Includes a clear and concise description of ICS security architecture and detailed description of device security configurations |
|
|
Does not include appendices |
Includes minimal appendices |
Include basic description of appendixes with good content |
Include detailed appendices that are appropriate to the content |
Include clear and concise appendices that build on the main content. |
|
|
No figures or descriptions (these can be embedded) |
Minor figures but not very relevant |
Good figures, tables and descriptions appropriate to content |
Well-defined figures and tables appropriate to the content |
Figures and descriptions are the content and express the ideas beyond the text. |
|
|
Ineffective documentation of research/support or 0 Prof references used |
Uses at least 2 Prof ref to support research with poor integration |
Uses at least 3 Prof ref to support research with adequate integration |
Uses at least 4 references and integrates them acceptably into the document |
Uses 5 or more references and integrates them clearly and concisely into the document |
|
|
Unsatisfactory |
Developing |
Competent |
Accomplished |
Exemplary |
|
Critical Thinking 30% of rubric score
|
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info is lacking |
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info is emerging |
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info is basic |
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info & link key relationships is proficient |
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info & link key relationships is superior |
|
|
Design does not discuss the impact of the unique challenges that exist in securing Industrial Control Systems |
Design marginally describes the impact of the unique challenges that exist in securing Industrial Control Systems |
Design assesses the impact of the unique challenges that exist in securing Industrial Control Systems |
Design effectively assess the impact of the unique challenges that exist in securing Industrial Control Systems with generalized solutions to address those challenges |
Design assess in technical detail the impact of the unique challenges that exist in securing Industrial Control Systems with customized solutions to address those challenges |
|
|
Design does not address methods to balance security with potential negative impact to process operations and productivity. |
Design documents need for balanced security but includes no discussion of how to achieve it. |
Design provides a basic description of methods to balance security with potential negative impact to process operations and productivity. |
Design provides a detailed description of methods to balance security with potential negative impact to process operations and productivity. |
Design provides a clear and concise description of methods to balance security with potential negative impact to process operations and productivity. |
|
|
Design does not provide any options for security implementations |
Design provides a small number of options for security implementations |
Design provides options for security implementations |
Design provides some options for security implementations with detailed guidance |
Design provides lots of options for security implementations with detailed guidance |
|
|
Unsatisfactory |
Developing |
Competent |
Accomplished |
Exemplary |
|
Communications (Written) 20% of rubric score
|
Sentences are not well-constructed and often lack clarity. Formats and patterns are repetitive |
Sentences are somewhat clear and well constructed, but lack variety in format& length |
Most sentences are clear and well-constructed some evidence of variety in format, length, and complexity. |
Sentences are clear and well-constructed - Some evidence of variety in format, length, and complexity |
Varied well-constructed sentences are evident throughout the document with an appropriate stylistic flair |
|
|
Paper is riddled with spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Paper contains 5 or 6 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Paper contains 3 or 4 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Paper contains 1 or 2 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
No spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent |
|
|
Paper is riddled with APA errors |
Paper contains 5 or 6 APA errors |
Paper contains 3 or 4 APA errors |
Paper contains 1 or 2 APA errors |
No APA errors are readily apparent |
|
|
Executive summary lacking or does not create interest
|
Executive summary evident but not particularly engaging
|
Executive summary creates interest and engages the audience
|
Executive summary creates interest and engages the audience, sets the stage for the main presentation |
Creates interest, engages and involves the audience, sets stage for the main presentation |
|
|
Main points are not clear or well organized - Lacks supporting evidence and detail |
Main points are clear but not well developed - More supporting evidence and detail are needed |
Main points are clear and well developed - Evidence and detail adequately support the presentation |
Main points are clear and well developed. Evidence and detail provide strong support for the presentation |
Main points are clear and well developed - Etc. Logical development is easy to follow |
|
|
No conclusion, paper just ends |
Conclusion exists but does not summarize |
Conclusion mentions main points |
Conclusion summarizes main points |
Conclusion summarizes and drives home main points. |
|
|
No presentation aids used |
Basic presentation aids used, either not well designed or well integrated into the presentation
|
Presentation aids are designed and integrated to communicate content but lack variety |
Presentation aids are well designed & integrated, as well as varied (some use of graphics/visual or sound effects) |
Presentation aids are of professional quality, enhancing the flow and persuasiveness (well integrated graphs, video or other electronic media) |