3 part assignment

profilep07141980
Rubric_Rubric_ClinicalFieldExperienceB.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
Clinical Field Experience B: Learning Differences
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Part 1: Instruction and Intervention 40.0% Not addressed. Interventions for inclusive classroom and at-home setting are inappropriate for students. Roles of teachers/family and student are not included or are inadequate. Inexplicit interventions for inclusive classroom and at-home setting do not demonstrate best practices. Roles of teachers/families and student are provided but are unfocused. Meaningful interventions for inclusive classroom and at-home setting are appropriate for students. Clear descriptions of roles of teachers/families and student are provided. Quality interventions for inclusive classroom and at-home setting innovatively demonstrate best practices. Substantial descriptions of roles of teachers/families and student are provided.
Part 2: Reflection- Lesson Experiences and Interventions 30.0% Not addressed. Reflection insufficiently summarizes lesson delivery, observations, and collaboration experiences. Ineffective explanation regarding expectations of meeting student needs through proposed interventions is provided, with flawed incorporation of assessment results. Reflection marginally summarizes lesson delivery, observations, and collaboration experiences. Surface level explanation regarding expectations of meeting student needs through proposed interventions is provided, with vague incorporation of assessment results. Reflection appropriately summarizes lesson delivery, observations, and collaboration experiences. Competent explanation regarding expectations of meeting student needs through proposed interventions is provided, with solid incorporation of assessment results. Reflection comprehensively summarizes lesson delivery, observations, and collaboration experiences with great insight. Thorough, professional explanation regarding expectations of meeting student needs through proposed interventions is provided, skillfully incorporating assessment results.
Part 2: Reflection- Applications to Future Professional Practice 10.0% Not addressed. Applications to future practice are incomplete or unrelated to what was described in the summary. Applications to future practice are unrealistic or underdeveloped. Applications to future practice are basic, useful, and appropriate for students. Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful, realistic, and clearly consider the needs of students.
Organization 10.0% Not addressed. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the summary is widely outside of the required word count. The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the required word count. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within a reasonable range of the required word count. The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the required word count.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%