comprehension

profilep07141980
Rubric_ReadingComprehension-StrategiesandActivities.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
Reading Comprehension: Strategies and Activities
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Part 1: Strategies 30.0% Not addressed. Summary insufficiently identifies reading comprehension strategies. Marginal summary of reading comprehension strategies is provided, weakly identifying conditions under which each is to be delivered for students with reading comprehension deficits. Sound summary of reading comprehension strategies is provided, identifying conditions under which each is to be delivered for students with reading comprehension deficits. Comprehensive summary of reading comprehension strategies is provided, clearly identifying conditions under which each is to be delivered for students with reading comprehension deficits.
Part 2: Activities 35.0% Not addressed. Outline and summary of activities unconvincingly attempts to engage and emphasize reading comprehension for chosen small group. Outline and summary of activities superficially engage and emphasize reading comprehension using irrelevant CCSS text and weak strategies for chosen small group. Outline and summary of activities engage and emphasize reading comprehension using identified CCSS text and applicable strategies appropriate for chosen small group. Outline and summary of activities thoroughly addresses and emphasizes reading comprehension using identified relevant CCSS text and suitable strategies appropriate for chosen small group.
Part 3: Rationale 20.0% Not addressed. Rationale is ineffective in explaining how instructional choices are applicable to the chosen small group or how the identified strategies and activities enhance the language development of adolescents with deficits in their reading comprehension skills. Rationale ambiguously supports instructional choices that are broadly applicable to the chosen small group. Minimally explains how the identified strategies and activities enhance the language development of adolescents with deficits in their reading comprehension skills. Rationale is effective in explaining how instructional choices applicable to the chosen small group. It clearly describes how the identified strategies and activities enhance the language development of adolescents with deficits in their reading comprehension skills. Rationale is comprehensive and professional in explaining how instructional choices are ideal for the chosen small group. It skillfully details how the identified strategies and activities enhance the language development of adolescents with deficits in their reading comprehension skills.
Research 5.0% Not addressed. Sources provided do not support the claims of the presentation or are not credible. Required number of sources may not be met. Submission includes only 1-2 sources, sources do not fully support claims, or sources are not all credible. Research is relevant and generally supports the information presented. All of the criteria stated in the assignment are addressed. Research is supportive of the information presented. Sources are timely, distinctive and clearly address all of the criteria stated in the assignment.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Total Weightage 100%