| Course Code | Class Code |
| ELM-560 | ELM-560-O501 | Clinical Field Experience D: Assessment and Feedback | 25.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Assessment | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Assessment is incomplete, poorly developed, and shows vague understanding of mastery of math standards and differentiation strategies. | Assessment is complete, but is underdeveloped and shows limited understanding of mastery of math standards and differentiation strategies. | Assessment is adequately developed and designed in order to determine mastery of math standards, with appropriate differentiation strategies. | Assessment is proficiently and thoughtfully developed and designed in order to determine mastery of math standards, with well-researched and appropriate differentiation strategies. |
| Reflection and Feedback | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Summary and reflection are missing and/or lacking in the description of pre-assessing, implementing instruction, assessment, and feedback, gaps did in the process, and how this can be done on the whole classroom level. | Summary and reflection include an incomplete description of pre-assessing, implementing instruction, assessment, and feedback, gaps did in the process, and how this can be done on the whole classroom level. | Summary and reflection include a sufficient description of pre-assessing, implementing instruction, assessment, and feedback, gaps did in the process, and how this can be done on the whole classroom level. | Summary and reflection includes a thorough and comprehensive description of pre-assessing, implementing instruction, assessment, and feedback, gaps did in the process, and how this can be done on the whole classroom level. |
| Future Implications | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are inappropriate or not related to assignment. Many aspects of format are missing or mistaken. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are lacking in detail of development as a professional. Some aspects of format are missing or mistaken. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are thoughtful and reflect growth and development as a professional. All required aspects of format are correct within the submission. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful and clearly reflect growth and development as a professional. All required aspects of format are correct within the submission. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures is used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Royce0615
Rubric_Print_FormatPreAssessmentandFeedback.xlsx
