Science Mini-Lesson Plan

profileRoyce0615
Rubric_Print_FormatMiniScienceLessonPlan.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ELM-570 ELM-570-O500 Clinical Field Experience C: Mini-Lesson Implementation 25.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
Mini-Lesson Plan 35.0% Not addressed. Mini-lesson plan is complete, with several errors. Learning objectives, instructional strategy, science and health learning activity, and formative assessment are poorly developed and inadequately aligned to chosen standards. Mini-lesson plan includes all components, with minimal errors. Learning objectives, instructional strategy, science and health learning activity, and formative assessment are overly simplistic and marginally align to chosen standards. Mini-lesson plan is appropriately designed with all components, including standards and grade level. Learning objectives, instructional strategy, science and health learning activity, and formative assessment are properly developed and adequately aligned to chosen standards. Mini-lesson plan is proficiently designed with all components, including appropriate standards and grade level. Learning objectives, instructional strategy, science and health learning activity, and formative assessment are well developed and proficiently aligned to chosen standards.
Reflection 35.0% Not addressed. Reflection is poorly written, is missing, and/or lacking in the description of how data supports instruction, necessary modifications, and considerations regarding ethical issues related to student data. Reflection vaguely and superficially describes how data supports instruction, necessary modifications, and considerations regarding ethical issues related to student data. Reflection adequately describes the explanation for choices explaining how data supports instruction, necessary modifications, and considerations regarding ethical issues related to student data. Reflection proficiently describes carefully planned, plausible reasoning explaining how data supports instruction, necessary modifications, and considerations regarding ethical issues related to student data.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 30.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%