| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| CNL-500 | CNL-500-O503 | Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory Application (Obj. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4) | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Counseling Goals and Intervention Strategies | 10.0% | Discussion of the counseling goals and intervention strategies is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of counseling goals and intervention strategies does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Discussion of the results of the counseling goals and intervention strategies is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of counseling goals and intervention strategies demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Discussion of the counseling goals and intervention strategies is accurate and complete.Discussion of counseling goals and intervention strategies demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Discussion of the counseling goals and intervention strategies is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of counseling goals and intervention strategies demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Discussion of the counseling goals and intervention strategies is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of counseling goals and intervention strategies demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Process of Treatment | 15.0% | Discussion of the process of treatment using Freud’s theory including the description of the length of treatment, the role of the counselor, and the experience of the client as they work from beginning to termination of therapy is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of the process of treatment does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Discussion of the process of treatment using Freud’s theory including the description of the length of treatment, the role of the counselor, and the experience of the client as they work from beginning to termination of therapy is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the process of treatment demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Discussion of the process of treatment using Freud’s theory including the description of the length of treatment, the role of the counselor, and the experience of the client as they work from beginning to termination of therapy is accurate and complete.Discussion of the process of treatment demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Discussion of the process of treatment using Freud’s theory including the description of the length of treatment, the role of the counselor, and the experience of the client as they work from beginning to termination of therapy is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the process of treatment demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Discussion of the process of treatment using Freud’s theory including the description of the length of treatment, the role of the counselor, and the experience of the client as they work from beginning to termination of therapy is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of the process of treatment demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Social and Cultural Needs of the Client | 15.0% | Discussion of how the theory addresses the social and cultural needs of the client with specific research findings is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of social and cultural needs of the client does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how the theory addresses the social and cultural needs of the client with specific research findings is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the social and cultural needs of the client demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how the theory addresses the social and cultural needs of the client with specific research findings is accurate and complete.Discussion of the social and cultural needs of the client demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how the theory addresses the social and cultural needs of the client with specific research findings is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the social and cultural needs of the client demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Discussion of how the theory addresses the social and cultural needs of the client with specific research findings is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of the social and cultural needs of the client demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Valuable Insights | 15.0% | Discussion of valuable insights of coming to understand the client’s unconscious world as the counseling process continues is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of valuable insights does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Discussion of valuable insights of coming to understand the client’s unconscious world as the counseling process continues is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of valuable insights demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Discussion of valuable insights of coming to understand the client’s unconscious world as the counseling process continues is accurate and complete.Discussion of valuable insights demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Discussion of valuable insights of coming to understand the client’s unconscious world as the counseling process continues is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of valuable insights demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Discussion of valuable insights of coming to understand the client’s unconscious world as the counseling process continues is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of valuable insights demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Implementation of Freudian Processes in Counseling | 15.0% | Discussion of how a counselor can implement Freudian processes in counseling without undue risk to the client or the counseling relationship is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of the implementation of Freudian processes in counseling does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how a counselor can implement Freudian processes in counseling without undue risk to the client or the counseling relationship is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the implementation of Freudian processes in counseling demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how a counselor can implement Freudian processes in counseling without undue risk to the client or the counseling relationship is accurate and complete.Discussion of the implementation of Freudian processes in counseling demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how a counselor can implement Freudian processes in counseling without undue risk to the client or the counseling relationship is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the implementation of Freudian processes in counseling demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Discussion of how a counselor can implement Freudian processes in counseling without undue risk to the client or the counseling relationship is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of the implementation of Freudian processes in counseling demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Rachaelm1
Rubric_Print_Formatfued.xlsx
