| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| CNL-500 | CNL-500-O503 | Comparison Worksheet (Obj. 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3) | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Part 1: Family Scenario | 20.0% | Worksheet omits or incompletely describes a family scenario that includes the members of the family, the problem/focus of therapy, family rules which enabled the problem to continue, and rationale for who the identified patient (IP) is.Worksheet does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Worksheet inadequately describes a family scenario that includes the members of the family, the problem/focus of therapy, family rules which enabled the problem to continue, and rationale for who the identified patient (IP) is. Worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Worksheet adequately describes a family scenario that includes the members of the family, the problem/focus of therapy, family rules which enabled the problem to continue, and rationale for who the identified patient (IP) is. Worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Worksheet clearly describes a family scenario that includes the members of the family, the problem/focus of therapy, family rules which enabled the problem to continue, and rationale for who the identified patient (IP) is. Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Worksheet expertly describes a family scenario that includes the members of the family, the problem/focus of therapy, family rules which enabled the problem to continue, and rationale for who the identified patient (IP) is. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part 2: Multi-Person Family Therapy | 20.0% | Worksheet omits or incompletely describes the theory chosen for multi-person family therapy, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis.Worksheet does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Worksheet inadequately describes the theory chosen for multi-person family therapy, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Worksheet adequately describes the theory chosen for multi-person family therapy, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Worksheet clearly describes the theory chosen for multi-person family therapy, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Worksheet expertly describes the theory chosen for multi-person family therapy, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part 2: Single Person Family Systems Approach | 20.0% | Worksheet omits or incompletely describes the theory chosen for single person family systems approach, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis.Worksheet does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Worksheet inadequately describes the theory chosen for single person family systems approach, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Worksheet adequately describes the theory chosen for single person family systems approach, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Worksheet clearly describes the theory chosen for single person family systems approach, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Worksheet expertly describes the theory chosen for single person family systems approach, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part 2: Individual Counseling Theory | 20.0% | Worksheet omits or incompletely describes the theory chosen for individual counseling theory, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis.Worksheet does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Worksheet inadequately describes the theory chosen for individual counseling theory, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Worksheet adequately describes the theory chosen individual counseling theory, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Worksheet clearly describes the theory chosen for individual counseling theory, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Worksheet expertly describes the theory chosen for individual counseling theory, including roles of the counselor and clients, the state of dysfunction, the process of change, listing of three treatment interventions, important ethical considerations, and how the theory would help the family in the scenario establish a new homeostasis, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Worksheet Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 10.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 10.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Rachaelm1
Rubric_Print_Formatforworksheet.xlsx
