| Course Code | Class Code |
| HLT-605 | HLT-605-O101 | Sample Budget | 70.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| HLT 605 Sample Budget Rubric | 100.0% |
| Budget Line Item Research | 20.0% | No research was done for the budget. | Very few items are filled in and not very well researched. | Most items are filled in and researched. | A substantial amount of the items are filled in and researched. | All of the necessary items are filled in and thoroughly researched. |
| Line Item Expense Projections | 25.0% | No projections for expenses were made. | Projections were made, but several projections are unrealistic. | Projections were made. Most items have realistic expenses projections. | Most expense projections are realistic. | Expense projections of all items are well proposed and realistic. |
| Narrative | 25.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Narrative is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Narrative lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Narrative is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. Presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Narrative shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Presentation | 20.0% | The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. | The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. | The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. | The presentation is good. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. | The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. |
| Mechanics of Writing (Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.) | 10.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
bttk20032004
Rubric_Print_Formatbudget.xlsx
