| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ITT-455 | ITT-455-O500 | Benchmark - Project Proposal Outline | 75.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Initial Outline Draft | 15.0% | Draft was not uploaded to the group discussion forum. | Draft uploaded to group discussion forum; provided after the designated timeline. | Draft uploaded to group discussion forum; provided by the designated timeline. | n/a | Draft uploaded to group discussion forum; provided before the designated timeline. |
| Final Outline Draft | 24.0% | Outline does not demonstrate knowledge of the subject. | Outline demonstrates knowledge of data center transition needs. | Outline demonstrates knowledge of data center transition needs by integrating major and minor concepts throughout three proposed solutions. | Outline demonstrates knowledge of data center transition needs by integrating major and minor concepts throughout. Student provides insightful comments for other students in discussion board. | Outline demonstrates knowledge of data center transition needs by integrating major and minor concepts throughout. Student provides insightful comments for other students in the discussion board. Student provides data to support the decision of selected solution. |
| Supporting Materials | 9.0% | No outside sources are used to support the assignment. | Few outside sources are used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. | Research was adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. | Research is timely and relevant and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. | Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. All of the issues stated in the assignment criteria are addressed. |
| Technical Knowledge | 24.0% | Outline has no technical solution identified. | Outline provides lack of what and why technical solution rationale. | Outline provides what and why technical solution rationale minimally. | Outline provides what and why technical solution rationale and it is feasible but needs more connection to the vision. | Outline provides clear and concise technical solution with a logical path to successful completion of the project that directly ties back to the vision statement. |
| Peer Review (C 5.3) | 15.0% | Posts do not encourage further discussion and dialogue with other students in the class. Individual group contributions are submitted extremely late, affecting the ability to accomplish a successful task. Cooperative teamwork is not evident. | Some posts encourage further discussion and extensive dialogue with other students in the class. Posts may be critical, argumentative, or confrontational. Some individual contributions are provided after the designated timeline, affecting the group?s ability to accomplish a successful task. | Peer review posts demonstrate a critical analysis of classmate?s postings and provide relevant and constructive feedback. Individual contributions are provided by the designated timeline. | Peer review posts demonstrate a critical analysis of classmate?s postings and provide relevant and constructive feedback. Individual contributions are provided by the designated timeline. Multiple posts made to assist with decision-making process of other students. | Peer review posts demonstrate a critical analysis of classmate?s postings and provide relevant and constructive feedback. Individual contributions are provided before the designated timeline. Multiple posts made to assist with decision-making process of fellow students for ranking proposed solutions. |
| Paragraph Development and Transitions | 5.0% | Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. | Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. | Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. | There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 1.0% | APA is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | APA is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | APA is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | APA is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. Free of any and all formatting errors. |
| Documentation of Sources (In-text citations for paraphrasing/direct quotes/images/etc. and reference page/bibliography as appropriate to assignment and style) (C 5.1) | 2.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
biolablaq
Rubric_Print_Format9.xlsx
