| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ACC-668 | ACC-668-O500 | Benchmark - Research Paper | 70.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 80.0% |
| Facts About the Case | 25.0% | Facts about the case are missing. | Limited facts about the case are present, but a summary of current developments is not provided. | Facts about the case are present, but only a partial summary of the current developments is provided. | Facts about the case are present along with a summary of the current developments. | Solid facts about the case and a comprehensive summary of the current developments are provided. |
| Analysis (C 3.1) | 30.0% | An analysis of the case is missing. | An analysis of the case is present, but state taxation implications applicable to the case are not provided. | An analysis of the case is present, but only limited state taxation implications applicable to the case are provided. | An analysis of the case is present along with applicable state taxation implications. | A thorough analysis of the case and detailed state taxation implications are provided. |
| Resulting Impact on Individual and the Business | 25.0% | The resulting impact of the changes on the individuals and the business is missing. | The resulting impact of the changes is present for either the individuals or the business, but not both. | The resulting impact of the changes on the individuals and the business is present, but requires more development. | The resulting impact of the changes on the individuals and the business is present. | A detailed conclusion on the resulting impact of the changes on the individuals and the business is present. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 10.0% |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 5.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is not followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Maree29
Rubric_Print_Format8.xlsx
