| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| PSY-362 | PSY-362-O501 | Prosocial Behavior-Online | 60.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 90.0% |
| Part I: Purpose of website/movement is discussed, including what story/stories were influential and why. | 10.0% | Purpose of website/movement is discussed, including what story/stories were influential and why are missing. | Purpose of website/movement is discussed, including what story/stories were influential and why are vague and inconsistent. | Purpose of website/movement is discussed, including what story/stories were influential and why are present. | Purpose of website/movement is discussed, including what story/stories were influential and why are present and clear. | Purpose of website/movement is discussed, including what story/stories were influential and why are clear, concise, and thoughtful. |
| Part II: Describe your implementation of kindness, what did you do, how did you approach the idea, where did you implement it and to whom? | 20.0% | Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is missing. | Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is vague or inadequate. | Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is adequate. | Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is clear. | Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is concise and thoughtful. |
| Describe the reactions you perceive from others and yourself. | 20.0% | Description of reactions is missing. | Description of reactions is vague or inadequate. | Description of reactions is adequate. | Description of reactions is clear. | Description of reactions is clear, thorough and concise. |
| Describe what you learn about prosocial behavior from this exercise. Compare the actual application of the behavior relative to this topic material. | 20.0% | Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is missing. | Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is vague or inadequate. | Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is adequate. | Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is clear and makes some connection to research. | Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is thoughtful and well-researched, makes relevant connections to current research. |
| If you are a faith-based person, explain how your faith helped you implement your helping behavior. If you are not a faith-based person, explain what philosophy, belief system, or values you connected to helping behavior. | 20.0% | Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is missing. | Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is vague or inadequate. | Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is adequate. | Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is clear. | Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is clear, thorough and concise. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 5.0% |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 5.0% |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |