epidemiologist

profilenuddwdmb68
Rubric_Print_Format8.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
PUB-540 PUB-540-O500 History, Principles, and Application of Epidemiology 125.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2. Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) 3. Satisfactory (79.00%) 4. Good (87.00%) 5. Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Definition of Epidemiology and Significance to Public Health 15.0% Definition of epidemiology and significance to public health is omitted. Definition of epidemiology and significance to public health is incomplete. Definition of epidemiology and significance to public health is summarized. There are some inaccuracies or minor omissions. An adequate definition of epidemiology is presented and its purpose and importance to public health are discussed. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. An accurate definition of epidemiology is presented and its purpose and importance to public health are clearly discussed.
Disease, Event, and Descriptive Epidemiology 30.0% A description of the disease, event, and application of descriptive epidemiology is omitted. A description of the disease, event, and application of descriptive epidemiology is incomplete. The disease and event are summarized. Descriptive epidemiology is generally used to discuss the commonality of disease for the time, who was infected, when it occurred, and mode of transmission. There are some inaccuracies or minor omissions. Some support is needed. The disease and event are discussed. Descriptive epidemiology is used to discuss commonality of disease for the time, who was infected, when it occurred, and mode of transmission. Applicable individuals or a significant disease for the period are discussed. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Adequate support is provided. The disease and event are detailed. Descriptive epidemiology is used to thoroughly discuss commonality of disease for the time, who was infected, when it occurred, and mode of transmission. Applicable individuals or a significant disease for the period are discussed. The narrative is well developed, and strong support is provided.
Influence of Individual or Advanced Epidemiological Method 15.0% An explanation for how the individual influenced epidemiology and the advanced methods and process used to describe and control disease is omitted. An explanation for how the individual influenced epidemiology and the advanced methods and process used to describe and control disease is incomplete. A general explanation for how the individual influenced epidemiology is presented. The advanced methods and the process used to describe and control disease are summarized. There are some inaccuracies or minor omissions. Some support is needed. An explanation for how the individual influenced epidemiology is presented. The advanced methods and the process used to describe and control disease are discussed. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Adequate support is provided. A clear explanation for how the individual influenced epidemiology is presented. The advanced methods and the process used to describe and control disease are thoroughly discussed. The narrative is well-supported.
Subspecialties in Epidemiology 10.0% Three subspecialties in epidemiology are omitted. Three subspecialties in epidemiology are presented. These are incomplete or contain major inaccuracies. Three subspecialties in epidemiology are summarized. There are some inaccuracies or minor omissions. Three subspecialties in epidemiology are described. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Three subspecialties in epidemiology are clearly and accurately described.
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Criteria 9Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%