| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| NUR-641E | NUR-641E-O501 | Acid-Base and Electrolyte Case Study | 167.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory 0-75% (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory 76-80% (80.00%) | 3: Satisfactory 81-88% (88.00%) | 4: Good 89-92% (92.00%) | 5: Excellent 93-100% (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| % Scaling | 100.0% |
| Identification of Abnormalities | 15.0% | Identification of the abnormal laboratory findings and their respective conditions is not included. | Identification of the abnormal laboratory findings and their respective conditions is incorrect and/or incomplete. | Identification of the abnormal laboratory findings and their respective conditions is mostly correct but is missing key specifics. | Identification of the abnormal laboratory findings and their respective conditions is accurate. | Identification of the abnormal laboratory findings is accurate, supplemented by a detailed and thorough identification of the conditions each abnormality indicates. |
| Identification of Electrolyte Disturbance | 15.0% | Identification of the electrolyte disturbance is not included. | Identification of the electrolyte disturbance is incorrect. | N/A | N/A | Identification of the electrolyte disturbance is correct. |
| Electrolyte Abnormality Clinical Manifestations | 15.0% | Identification of electrolyte abnormality clinical manifestations is not included. | Identification of electrolyte abnormality clinical manifestations is incorrect and/or incomplete. | Identification of electrolyte abnormality clinical manifestations is mostly correct but is missing key symptoms. | Identification of electrolyte abnormality clinical manifestations is accurate. | Identification of electrolyte abnormality clinical manifestations is accurate, supported by thorough and detailed insight. |
| Increased Potassium Clinical Manifestations | 15.0% | Identification of increased potassium level clinical manifestations is not included. | Identification of increased potassium level clinical manifestations is incorrect and/or incomplete. | Identification of increased potassium level clinical manifestations is mostly correct but is missing key symptoms. | Identification of increased potassium level clinical manifestations is accurate. | Identification of increased potassium level clinical manifestations is accurate, supported by detailed and thorough insight. |
| Blood Gas Abnormality | 15.0% | Assessment of blood gas abnormality is not included. | Assessment of blood gas abnormality is incorrect and/or incomplete. | Assessment of blood gas abnormality is mostly correct but is missing key specifics. | Assessment of blood gas abnormality is accurate. | Assessment of blood gas abnormality is accurate, supported by a detailed and thorough discussion of the patient’s condition. |
| Mechanisms of pH Regulation | 15.0% | The three major mechanisms of pH regulation are not addressed. | The three major mechanisms of pH regulation are incorrect and/or incomplete. | The three major mechanisms of pH regulation are mostly correct. | The three major mechanisms of pH regulation are accurately identified. | The three major mechanisms of pH regulation are accurately identified, and the properties of each mechanism are briefly described. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
aleena28
Rubric_Print_Format8.xlsx
