(** KIM WOODS ONLY **) Hypothesis Worksheet

profileSoCalNB
Rubric_Print_Format8.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ENT-436 ENT-436-O500 CLC - Hypotheses 50.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Hypotheses 20.0% Fewer than four hypotheses are included and explained. At least four hypotheses are included and explained. At least five hypotheses are included and explained. All seven hypotheses are included, but they lack thoroughness. All seven hypothesis are developed with good, better, and best versions.
Independent and Dependent Variables 20.0% Independent and dependent variables are inaccurate or missing. At least four hypotheses include both an accurate dependent and independent variable. At least five hypotheses include both an accurate dependent and independent variable. At least six hypotheses include both an accurate dependent and independent variable. All seven hypotheses include both an accurate dependent and independent variable.
Testability of Variables 50.0% Hypotheses are not immediately testable, measurable, and meaningful. At least four hypotheses are immediately testable, measurable, and meaningful. At least five hypotheses are immediately testable, measurable, and meaningful. At least six hypotheses are immediately testable, measurable, and meaningful. All seven hypotheses are immediately testable, measurable, and meaningful.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%