| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ECS-585 | ECS-585-O500 | Clinical Field Experience C: Field of Engineering Lessons | 50.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Strategies | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection is incomplete or inadequately describes your experience using the identified strategies with the small group during the science lesson or activity. | Reflection is basic and broadly describes your experience using the identified strategies with the small group during the science lesson or activity. | Reflection clearly describes your experience using the identified strategies with the small group during the science lesson or activity. | Reflection skillfully and concisely describes your experience using the identified strategies with the small group during the science lesson or activity. |
| Future Professional Practice | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Applications to future practice are incomplete or unrelated to what was described in the summary. | Applications to future practice are unrealistic or underdeveloped. | Applications to future practice are basic, useful, and appropriate for students. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful, realistic, and clearly consider the needs of students. |
| Incorporation of Engineering into Main Content Area. Field of Engineering Named | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection did not sufficiently discuss how the lesson incorporates engineering into the main content area. The field of engineering is not clearly noted. | Reflection broadly discusses how the lesson incorporates engineering into the main content area, but is lacking detail. The field of engineering is noted. | Reflection clearly discusses how the lesson incorporates engineering into the main content area. The field of engineering is noted. | Reflection skillfully and concisely discusses how the lesson incorporates engineering into the main content area. The field of engineering is concisely noted. |
| Examples of Engineering Principles | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection insufficiently discusses how the mentor teacher included engineering principles. Examples are inadequately described. | Reflection minimally discusses how the mentor teacher included engineering principles. Examples are lacking detail. | Reflection clearly discusses how the mentor teacher included engineering principles. Examples are described. | Reflection skillfully and concisely discusses how the mentor teacher included engineering principles. Examples are skillfully described. |
| Integration of Engineering, Math and Science | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection insufficiently discusses how the mentor teacher may have integrated engineering with math and science. Or, if integration did not happen, the teacher candidate inadequately discusses integration suggestions. | Reflection broadly discusses how the mentor teacher may have integrated engineering with math and science. Or, if integration did not happen, the teacher candidate broadly discusses integration suggestions. | Reflection clearly discusses how the mentor teacher may have integrated engineering with math and science. Or, if integration did not happen, the teacher candidate discusses their integration suggestions. | Reflection skillfully and concisely discusses how the mentor teacher may have integrated engineering with math and science. Or, if integration did not happen, the teacher candidate skillfully discusses their own integration suggestions. |
| Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language or word choice may be present. Sentence structure may not be varied. | The submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | The submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
rnixon@12345
Rubric_Print_Format8.xlsx
