| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| PSY-362 | PSY-362-O501 | 12 Angry Men and Groupthink-Online | 60.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 85.0% |
| Define patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority influence, and other social influences. Provide specific examples witnessed in the film. | 20.0% | Definition of patterns of persuasion conformity, minority influence, and other social influences is missing. No examples from the film given. | Definition of patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority influence, and other social influences is incomplete or vague. Poor or vague examples from the film are given. | Definition of patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority influence, and other social influences is somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity. Simplistic examples from the film are present. | Definition of patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority influence, and other social influences is appropriate, and detailed. Examples from the film are clear and accurate. | Definition of patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority influence, and other social influences is clear and comprehensive. Examples from the film are exceptional. |
| Analyze issues of stereotypes and prejudice observed while watching the jurors deliberate in the film by explaining the issues in historical context. | 20.0% | Definition of stereotypes and prejudice, and explanation of four historical issues of stereotype and prejudice shown in the film is missing. | Definition of stereotypes and prejudice, and explanation of four historical issues of stereotype and prejudice portrayed in the film is vague or incomplete. | Definition of stereotypes and prejudice, and explanation of four historical issues of stereotype and prejudice portrayed in the film is somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity. | Definition of stereotypes and prejudice, and explanation of four historical issues of stereotype and prejudice portrayed in the film is appropriate and detailed. | Definition of stereotypes and prejudice, and explanation of four historical issues of stereotype and prejudice portrayed in the film is clear and comprehensive. |
| Analyze the cognitive heuristics present in the movie. Provide an example of three cognitive heuristics represented in the film and label them (e.g. availability, false consensus, social proof). | 15.0% | Definition of cognitive heuristics, as well as an example of three cognitive heuristics represented in the film is missing. | Definition of cognitive heuristics, as well as an example of three cognitive heuristics represented in the film is vague or inadequate. | Definition of cognitive heuristics, as well as an example of three cognitive heuristics represented in the film is somewhat appropriate but lacks some essential details or clarity. | Definition of cognitive heuristics, as well as an example of three cognitive heuristics represented in the film is clear and accurate. | Definition of cognitive heuristics, as well as an example of three cognitive heuristics represented in the film is thorough, clear, and completely accurate. |
| Interpret the catalyst of change that resulted in the outcome of the film, based on your perceptions. | 15.0% | Definition of the term catalyst for change, as well as interpretation of the change catalyst that resulted in the film outcome is missing. | Definition of the term catalyst for change, as well as interpretation of the change catalyst that resulted in the film outcome is vague or inadequate. | Definition of the term catalyst for change, as well as interpretation of the change catalyst that resulted in the film outcome is somewhat limited but lacks some essential details or clarity. | Definition of the term catalyst for change, as well as interpretation of the change catalyst that resulted in the film outcome is clear and accurate. | Definition of the term catalyst for change, as well as interpretation of the change catalyst that resulted in the film outcome is thoughtful, thorough, and comprehensive. |
| Define groupthink and group polarization. Explain if the group in the film demonstrates group polarization, or if they are at risk for groupthink. | 15.0% | Definition of groupthink and group polarization, as well as explanation of whether the group in the film demonstrated group polarization, or if they are at risk for groupthink, is missing. | Definition of groupthink and group polarization, as well as explanation of whether the group in the film demonstrated group polarization, or if they are at risk for groupthink, is vague or inadequate. | Definition of groupthink and group polarization, as well as explanation of whether the group in the film demonstrated group polarization, or if they are at risk for groupthink, is somewhat limited but lacks some essential details or clarity. | Definition of groupthink and group polarization, as well as explanation of whether the group in the film demonstrated group polarization, or if they are at risk for groupthink, is clear and accurate. | Definition of groupthink and group polarization, as well as explanation of whether the group in the film demonstrated group polarization, or if they are at risk for groupthink, is insightful, clear, and fully accurate. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 10.0% |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 5.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 5.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 3.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 2.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Mommia
Rubric_Print_Format7.xlsx
