Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper

profilenuddwdmb68
Rubric_Print_Format7.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-590 NUR-590-O500 Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper 250.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
Translation of Research and Knowledge Gained From Practice, While Adhering to Ethical Research Standards, to Improve Patient Outcomes and Clinical Practice (1.1) 15.0% Translation of research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice is not included. Translation of research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Translation of research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice is present. Translation of research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice is clearly provided and well developed. Translation of research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Application of Theoretical Frameworks From Nursing and Other Disciplines to Make Decisions Regarding Practice and Health-Related Problems at the Individual and Population Level (1.2) 15.0% Application of theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is not included. Application of theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Application of theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is present. Application of theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is clearly provided and well developed. Application of theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Assessment of Health Care Processes and Systems to Recommend Measures for Improving Quality, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness Across an Organization (3.1) 10.0% An assessment of health care processes and systems to recommend measures for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness across an organization is not included. An assessment of health care processes and systems to recommend measures for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness across an organization is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. An assessment of health care processes and systems to recommend measures for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness across an organization is present. An assessment of health care processes and systems to recommend measures for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness across an organization is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive assessment of health care processes and systems to recommend measures for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness across an organization is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Integration of Appropriate Information and Communication Technologies to Improve Nursing Practice and Care Delivery for Individuals and Populations (3.3) 10.0% An integration of appropriate information and communication technologies to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations is not included. An integration of appropriate information and communication technologies to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. An integration of appropriate information and communication technologies to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations is present. An integration of appropriate information and communication technologies to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive integration of appropriate information and communication technologies to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Design of Ethically Sound, Evidence-Based Solutions to Complex Health Care Issues Related to Individuals, Populations, and Systems of Care (5.1) 10.0% Design of ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care is not included. Design of ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Design of ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care is present. Design of ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care is clearly provided and well developed. Design of ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Evaluation of Process 5.0% An evaluation of process is not included. An evaluation of process is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. An evaluation of process is present. An evaluation of process is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive evaluation of process is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Required Sources 5.0% Sources are not included. Number of required sources is only partially met. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%