| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ECS-590 | ECS-590-O500 | Special Education Identification Processes Parent Presentation | 70.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: No Submission (0.00%) | 2: Insufficient (69.00%) | 3: Approaching (74.00%) | 4: Acceptable (87.00%) | 5: Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| District Legal Responsibilities and Timelines | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Presentation content insufficiently or inaccurately describes district legal responsibilities and timelines. | Presentation content vaguely describes district legal responsibilities and timelines, but is lacking in substantive detail. | Presentation content includes a clear, accurate description of district legal responsibilities and timelines. | Presentation content includes a comprehensive overview of district legal responsibilities and timelines that is accurate and thorough. |
| Information about Purpose and Parent Rights Related to PWN | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Overview of PWN is inaccurate and insufficiently explains its purpose and relation to parent rights. | Overview of PWN is lacking in substantive detail and does not fully explain its purpose and relation to parent rights. | Overview of PWN is accurate and incorporates a clear explanation of its purpose and relation to parent rights. | Presentation includes a comprehensive overview of PWN that incorporates an accurate and thorough explanation of its purpose and relation to parent rights. |
| Information about Purpose and Parent Rights Related to Procedural Safeguards | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Overview of procedural safeguards is inaccurate or insufficiently defines them and their purpose. | Overview of procedural safeguards is lacking in substantive detail and does not fully define them or explain their purpose. | Presentation includes an overview of procedural safeguards that is accurate and incorporates a clear explanation of their purpose. | Presentation includes a comprehensive overview of procedural safeguards that incorporates an accurate and thorough explanation of their purpose. |
| Role and Responsibilities of the Special Education Teacher | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Presentation inaccurately describes the role and responsibilities of the special education teacher. | Presentation inadequately describes the role and responsibilities of the special education teacher. | Presentation clearly and accurately describes the role and responsibilities of the special education teacher. | Presentation insightfully and professionally describes the role and responsibilities of the special education teacher. |
| Presentation | 10.0% | Not addressed. | The work is not neat or organized. Work would not be presentable for public dissemination. | The work is not neat and includes minor organizational flaws. Work would barely be presentable for public dissemination | The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be acceptable for public dissemination. | The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly desirable for public dissemination. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | The work is not neat or organized. Work would not be presentable for public dissemination. | The work is not neat and includes minor organizational flaws. Work would barely be presentable for public dissemination. | The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be acceptable for public dissemination. | The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly desirable for public dissemination. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |