Special Education Identification Processes Parent Presentation

profilernixon@12345
Rubric_Print_Format69.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ECS-590 ECS-590-O500 Special Education Identification Processes Parent Presentation 70.0
Criteria Percentage 1: No Submission (0.00%) 2: Insufficient (69.00%) 3: Approaching (74.00%) 4: Acceptable (87.00%) 5: Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
District Legal Responsibilities and Timelines 20.0% Not addressed. Presentation content insufficiently or inaccurately describes district legal responsibilities and timelines. Presentation content vaguely describes district legal responsibilities and timelines, but is lacking in substantive detail. Presentation content includes a clear, accurate description of district legal responsibilities and timelines. Presentation content includes a comprehensive overview of district legal responsibilities and timelines that is accurate and thorough.
Information about Purpose and Parent Rights Related to PWN 20.0% Not addressed. Overview of PWN is inaccurate and insufficiently explains its purpose and relation to parent rights. Overview of PWN is lacking in substantive detail and does not fully explain its purpose and relation to parent rights. Overview of PWN is accurate and incorporates a clear explanation of its purpose and relation to parent rights. Presentation includes a comprehensive overview of PWN that incorporates an accurate and thorough explanation of its purpose and relation to parent rights.
Information about Purpose and Parent Rights Related to Procedural Safeguards 20.0% Not addressed. Overview of procedural safeguards is inaccurate or insufficiently defines them and their purpose. Overview of procedural safeguards is lacking in substantive detail and does not fully define them or explain their purpose. Presentation includes an overview of procedural safeguards that is accurate and incorporates a clear explanation of their purpose. Presentation includes a comprehensive overview of procedural safeguards that incorporates an accurate and thorough explanation of their purpose.
Role and Responsibilities of the Special Education Teacher 20.0% Not addressed. Presentation inaccurately describes the role and responsibilities of the special education teacher. Presentation inadequately describes the role and responsibilities of the special education teacher. Presentation clearly and accurately describes the role and responsibilities of the special education teacher. Presentation insightfully and professionally describes the role and responsibilities of the special education teacher.
Presentation 10.0% Not addressed. The work is not neat or organized. Work would not be presentable for public dissemination. The work is not neat and includes minor organizational flaws. Work would barely be presentable for public dissemination The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be acceptable for public dissemination. The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly desirable for public dissemination.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Not addressed. The work is not neat or organized. Work would not be presentable for public dissemination. The work is not neat and includes minor organizational flaws. Work would barely be presentable for public dissemination. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be acceptable for public dissemination. The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly desirable for public dissemination.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%