Disability Comparison Template

profilePookie624
Rubric_Print_Format6.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
SPD-500 SPD-500-O503 Disability Comparison Template 60.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Group 1 100.0%
IDEA Disability Categories Chart 45.0% Not addressed. IDEA disability categories chart, including definition, characteristics, causes, prevalence, and potential effect on learning, is incomplete and/or incorrect. IDEA disability categories chart, including definition, characteristics, causes, prevalence, and potential effect on learning, is partially complete but contains errors in multiple categories. IDEA disability categories chart, including definition, characteristics, causes, prevalence, and potential effect on learning, is mostly complete and correct for each category. IDEA disability categories chart, including definition, characteristics, causes, prevalence, and potential effect on learning, is thorough and ideal for each category.
Common Learning Disabilities Chart 45.0% Not addressed. Common learning disability chart, including definition, characteristics, causes, prevalence, and potential effect on learning, is incomplete and/or incorrect. Common learning disability chart, including definition, characteristics, causes, prevalence, and potential effect on learning, is partially complete but contains errors. Common learning disability chart, including definition, characteristics, causes, prevalence, and potential effect on learning, is mostly complete and correct for each disability. Common learning disability chart, including definition, characteristics, causes, prevalence, and potential effect on learning, is thorough and ideal for each disability.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%