| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| PSY-362 | PSY-362-O501 | Benchmark - Implicit Prejudice | 70.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Group 1 | 70.0% |
| Describe which test was taken and the results. | 15.0% | Description of which test was taken and the results are missing. | Description of which test was taken and the results are vague and inconsistent. | Description of which test was taken and the results are present. | Description of which test was taken and the results are present and clear. | Description of which test was taken and the results are clear and concise. |
| Discuss your results, including if the results were surprising. | 15.0% | Discussion of results is missing. | Discussion of results is vague and does not include if results were surprising to student. | Discussion of results are present and includes some element of surprise in the results. | Discussion of results are present. Discussion includes if the results were a surprise to the student. | Discussion of results are clear and concise. Discussion includes if the results were a surprise to the student. |
| Reflect on the student’s own implicit bias, including the causes of prejudicial attitudes and discriminatory behaviors seen in others. (C3.3) | 20.0% | Reflection on the results of student’s own implicit bias is missing. | Reflection on the results of student’s own implicit bias is vague and inconsistent. Reflection does not include causes of prejudicial attitudes and discriminatory behaviors seen in others. | Reflection on the results of student’s own implicit bias is present. Reflection somewhat includes causes of prejudicial attitudes and discriminatory behaviors seen in others. | Reflection on the results of student’s own implicit bias is clear. Reflection includes causes of prejudicial attitudes and discriminatory behaviors seen in others. | Reflection on the results of student’s own implicit bias is clear, concise and includes causes of prejudicial attitudes and discriminatory behaviors seen in others. |
| Discuss if test is valid and reliable measure of implicit bias | 20.0% | Discussion if test is valid and a reliable measure of implicit bias is missing. | Discussion if test is valid and a reliable measure of implicit bias is vague and inconsistent. | Discussion if test is valid and a reliable measure of implicit bias is present. | Discussion if test is valid and a reliable measure of implicit bias is present and clear. | Discussion if test is valid and a reliable measure of implicit bias is clear, concise and makes some connection to research. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 10.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Mommia
Rubric_Print_Format6.xlsx
