540 paper

profileKyeugelowitz1
Rubric_Print_Format6.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ECE-540 ECE-540-O500 Benchmark – Literature Learning Centers 300.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Learning Center 1 10.0% Not addressed. Individual learning objectives are not specified. Materials and directions are inadequate or incomplete. Leveled questions are irrelevant or not included. Individual learning objectives are minimally specified. Materials and directions are lacking detail or overly simplistic. Leveled questions are superficial and support individual student development of the objective. Individual learning objectives are clearly specified. Materials and directions are detailed and relevant. Leveled questions are appropriate and support individual student development of the objective. Individual learning objectives are expertly specified. Materials and directions are thorough and extensive. Leveled questions are thought-provoking support individual student development of the objective.
Learning Center 2 10.0% Not addressed. Individual learning objectives are not specified. Materials and directions are inadequate or incomplete. Leveled questions are irrelevant or not included. Individual learning objectives are minimally specified. Materials and directions are lacking detail or overly simplistic. Leveled questions are superficial and support individual student development of the objective. Individual learning objectives are clearly specified. Materials and directions are detailed and relevant. Leveled questions are appropriate and support individual student development of the objective. Individual learning objectives are expertly specified. Materials and directions are thorough and extensive. Leveled questions are thought-provoking support individual student development of the objective.
Learning Center 3 10.0% Not addressed. Individual learning objectives are not specified. Materials and directions are inadequate or incomplete. Leveled questions are irrelevant or not included. Individual learning objectives are minimally specified. Materials and directions are lacking detail or overly simplistic. Leveled questions are superficial and support individual student development of the objective. Individual learning objectives are clearly specified. Materials and directions are detailed and relevant. Leveled questions are appropriate and support individual student development of the objective. Individual learning objectives are expertly specified. Materials and directions are thorough and extensive. Leveled questions are thought-provoking support individual student development of the objective.
Developmental, Cultural, and Linguistic Appropriateness COE 3.3 NAEYC: 4a, 4b, 4c InTASC: 3(a), 3(b), 3(g), 3(h), 3(m), 3(n), 3(o), 3(q), 7(c), 7(i), 7(j), 7(k), 7 (m), 7(o), 8(c), 8(e), 8(h), 8(k), 8(m), 8(p) ISTE-T: 2a, 2b, 2c, 4b 15.0% Not addressed. Explanation of developmental, cultural, and linguistic appropriateness is unconvincing. Explanation of developmental, cultural, and linguistic appropriateness is vague. Explanation of developmental, cultural, and linguistic appropriateness is reasonable. Explanation of developmental, cultural, and linguistic appropriateness is compelling.
Technology Integration COE 3.5 NAEYC: 4a, 4b, 4c InTASC: 3(a), 3(b), 3(g), 3(h), 3(m), 3(n), 3(o), 3(q), 7(c), 7(i), 7(j), 7(k), 7 (m), 7(o), 8(c), 8(e), 8(h), 8(k), 8(m), 8(p) ISTE-T: 2a, 2b, 2c, 4b 15.0% Not addressed. Technology is unrealistically integrated into at least one learning center activity. Technology is weakly integrated into at least one learning center activity. Technology is effectively integrated into at least one learning center activity. Technology is innovatively integrated into at least one learning center activity.
Learning Environment COE 3.1 NAEYC: 4a, 4b, 4c InTASC: 3(a), 3(b), 3(g), 3(h), 3(m), 3(n), 3(o), 3(q), 7(c), 7(i), 7(j), 7(k), 7 (m), 7(o), 8(c), 8(e), 8(h), 8(k), 8(m), 8(p) ISTE-T: 2a, 2b, 2c, 4b 15.0% Not addressed. Ineffectively describes collaboration between teachers and families to create positive learning environment. Marginally describes collaboration between teachers and families to create positive learning environment. Describes collaboration between teachers and families to create positive learning environment in detail. Proficiently describes collaboration between teachers and families to create positive learning environment.
Format and Documentation of Sources (layout, citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.) 5.0% Not addressed. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some key formatting and citation errors are present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style. Format is free of error.
Organization 10.0% Not addressed. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%