520 paper

profileKyeugelowitz1
Rubric_Print_Format6.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ECE-520 ECE-520-O500 Instructional Interventions 70.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Sources of Data 20.0% Not addressed. Insufficiently identifies and describes sources of data that a teacher could use to inform their practice. Vaguely identifies and describes sources of data that a teacher could use to inform their practice. Clearly identifies and describes sources of data that a teacher could use to inform their practice. Thoroughly identifies and describes sources of data that a teacher could use to inform their practice.
Accessing the Assessment Data 20.0% Not addressed. Ineffectively explains where teachers would find or access this assessment data. Unclearly explains where teachers would find or access this assessment data. Effectively explains where teachers would find or access this assessment data. Specifically explains where teachers would find or access this assessment data.
Informed Teaching 20.0% Not addressed. Demonstrates inaccurately how the data source helps inform teaching. Minimally demonstrates how the data source helps inform teaching. Properly demonstrates how the data source helps inform teaching. Realistically demonstrates how the data source helps inform teaching.
Organization of Data 20.0% Not addressed. Includes unrealistic ideas for organizing (including use of technology), analyzing, or interpreting information from the data source. Includes unfocused ideas for organizing (including use of technology), analyzing, or interpreting information from the data source. Includes solid ideas for organizing (including use of technology), analyzing, or interpreting information from the data source. Extensively includes ideas for organizing (including use of technology), analyzing, or interpreting information from the data source.
Aesthetic Quality 10.0% Not addressed. Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, or busy. Little to no creativity or inventiveness is present. Design is fairly clean, with some exceptions. Audience may not be readily apparent. Visuals do not fully support the message. Design is clean and audience is apparent. Purposeful integration of appropriate objects, charts, and/or graphs supports the message and enhance the presentation. Design is professional, visually appealing, and clearly catered to the audience. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Format and Documentation of Sources (layout, citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Not addressed. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some key formatting and citation errors are present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style. Format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%