| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ECS-585 | ECS-585-O500 | Clinical Field Experience B: Science Lessons | 50.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Identification of Small Group | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection is incomplete or inadequately describes how the mentor teacher identified the small group chosen for you to work with. | Reflection is basic and broadly discusses how the mentor teacher identified the small group chosen for you to work with. | Reflection clearly discusses how the mentor teacher identified the small group chosen for you to work with. | Reflection skillfully and concisely discusses how the mentor teacher identified the small group chosen for you to work with. |
| Differentiation | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection is incomplete or inadequately describes the differentiation and engagement strategies used in relation to the needs of the students you worked with. | Reflection is basic and broadly describes the differentiation and engagement strategies used in relation to the needs of the students you worked with. | Reflection clearly describes the differentiation and engagement strategies used in relation to the needs of the students you worked with. | Reflection skillfully and concisely describes the differentiation and engagement strategies used in relation to the needs of the students you worked with. |
| Strategies | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection is incomplete or inadequately describes your experience using the identified strategies with the small group during the science lesson or activity. | Reflection is basic and broadly describes your experience using the identified strategies with the small group during the science lesson or activity. | Reflection clearly describes your experience using the identified strategies with the small group during the science lesson or activity. | Reflection skillfully and concisely describes your experience using the identified strategies with the small group during the science lesson or activity. |
| Future Professional Practice | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Applications to future practice are incomplete or unrelated to what was described in the summary. | Applications to future practice are unrealistic or underdeveloped. | Applications to future practice are basic, useful, and appropriate for students. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful, realistic, and clearly consider the needs of students. |
| Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language or word choice may be present. Sentence structure may not be varied. | The submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | The submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors are present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
rnixon@12345
Rubric_Print_Format6.xlsx
