| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| HLT-324V | HLT-324V-O500 | Family Interview - Compare and Contrast Cultures Paper | 150.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 80.0% |
| Interviews | 30.0% | The interview template is not used. A summary of the information gathered in the interviews is not provided. | The interview template is partially used; a minimum of eight of the standard questions are addressed. No additional questions are written or asked; or, the additional questions asked are not related to the course material or the interview. No additional value is created by asking the questions. A partial summary of the interviews is provided. Most of the information is listed using the format presented in the template. | The interview template is partially used; a minimum of nine of the standard questions are addressed. Two additional questions are asked. The additional questions reflect the concepts from the course material, but the questions are not entirely relevant to the interviews. Some additional value are created by asking the questions. The information is written in the form of an academic summary, but some of the information is missing. | The interview template is used. The additional questions reflect relevant concepts from the course material, and are relevant to the interviews. Additional value is created by asking the questions. The information is written in the form of an academic summary. | The interview template is used. The additional questions utilize specific concepts from the course material in a manner that gathers in-depth responses from the interviewees. The additional questions provide deeper insight for understanding culture. The information from the interviews is well-organized in the form of an academic summary. |
| Compare and Contrast Family Cultures | 30.0% | A comparison and contrast between family cultures is not presented. | The comparison and contrast between family cultures is incomplete. It is unclear which cultural aspects were compared or contrasted between the two cultures; or, the analysis focuses primarily on one culture. | The comparison and contrast between family cultures is too broad to accurately explore cultural similarities and differences. The analysis fails to examine the specific responses presented in the interviews. | The comparison and contrast between family cultures explores cultural similarities and differences. The analysis examines the responses presented in the interviews. | The comparison and contrast between family cultures explores cultural similarities and differences in great detail. The analysis examines specific responses presented in the interviews and generates insight into the two cultures. |
| Influence of Family Roles | 20.0% | A reflection of family roles is not included. | A brief reflection on how family roles affect culture is presented. Similarities or differences are acknowledged, but not clearly addressed. | A brief reflection on how family roles affect other cultural domains and relationships is presented. Some similarities or differences are identified. | A reflection on how family roles affect other cultural domains and relationships is presented. General similarities and differences that occur between the two individuals as a result of family roles are identified. | A reflection on how family roles affect other cultural domains and relationships is insightful and supported with evidence. Specific similarities and differences that occur between the two individuals as a result of family roles are identified. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 17.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 6.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Paragraph Development and Transitions | 6.0% | Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. | Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. | Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. | There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 3.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 1.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) | 2.0% | No reference page is included. No citations are used. | Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. | Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present | Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. | In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
mommy
Rubric_Print_Format52.xlsx
