Professional Resource rubric

profileK_Coromandel
Rubric_Print_Format5.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ECS-567 ECS-567-O500 Professional Resources 20.0
Criteria Percentage 1: No Submission (0.00%) 2: Insufficient (69.00%) 3: Approaching (74.00%) 4: Acceptable (87.00%) 5: Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Professional Resources: Organization Information 10.0% Not addressed. Incomplete or irrelevant organizations information was given. Lacking data but provides some of the information including name of the organizations, website address, headquarters location, or date established. Organization information is direct and provides all information including name of the organization, website address, headquarters location, and date established. Organization information is comprehensive and accurate and provides all information including name of the organization, website address, headquarters location, and date established.
Professional Resources: Services 10.0% Not addressed. Incomplete or flawed information is given about the services the organizations provides including the target audience and the legal and/or historical information. A vague explanation of the services the organizations provides is given. There are minimal details provided on the target audience and the legal and/or historical information. A clear and descriptive explanation of the services the organizations provides is given. There are relevant details provided on the target audience and a description of the legal and/or historical information. A comprehensive and thorough explanation of the services the organizations provides is given. There are substantial details provided on the target audience and an in-depth description of legal and/or historical information.
Professional Resources: Mission and Philosophy 10.0% Not addressed. The mission and philosophy of the organizations and the philosophical foundation of the organization that motivates them to provide their services is incomplete or unrelated. The mission and philosophy of the organizations and the philosophical foundation of the organization that motivates them to provide their services is unclear. The mission and philosophy of the organizations properly identifies the philosophical foundation of the organization that motivates them to provide their services. The mission and philosophy of the organizations is in-depth and clearly identifies the philosophical foundation of the organization that motivates them to provide their services.
Professional Resources: Hierarchical Structure 10.0% Not addressed. The hierarchical structure of the organizations is incomplete or irrelevant. The hierarchical structure of the organizations lack explanations. The hierarchical structure of the organizations are logically explained. The hierarchical structure of the organizations are thoroughly explained.
Professional Resources: Funding and Status 10.0% Not addressed. Inadequate explanation of how the organizations are funded and the status of the organizations is provided. Minimal explanation of how the organizations are funded and the status of the organizations is provided. A clear explanation of how the organizations are funded and the status of the organizations is outlined. Comprehensive explanation of how the organizations are funded and the status of the organizations is provided.
Professional Resources: Training 10.0% Not addressed. Training opportunities applicable to the organization are incompetently explained or missing. An unclear explanation of training opportunities applicable to the organization is included. Training opportunities applicable to the organization are competently explained. A quality explanation of training opportunities applicable to the organization is included.
Professional Resources: Rationale 25.0% Not addressed. An incomplete or poor rationale about the organizations recommendations to teacher and staff is provided. A vague rationale about the organizations attempts to provide a recommendation to teachers and staff. A logical rationale about the organizations provides a clear recommendation to teachers and staff. A well-crafted rationale about the organizations provides a persuasive recommendation to teachers and staff.
Research Citations and Format (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 10.0% Not addressed. Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. Some citations may be missing where needed; or some of the sources do not support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken. All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%