| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| UNV-504 | UNV-504-O102 | Annotated Bibliography | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 75.0% |
| Servant Leadership | 25.0% | Annotated bibliography does not provide the following: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered. Source selected is not appropriate. | Annotated bibliography includes the following: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered; however, it is unclear, lengthy, incomplete, or source selected is not scholarly. | Annotated bibliography includes the following: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered. Main idea is not expressed in a clear and concise manner, or explanation of why the article is scholarly is vague. | Annotated bibliography includes the following in a clear and concise manner: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered scholarly. | Annotated bibliography includes the following in a clear, thorough, and concise manner: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered scholarly. |
| Ethics | 25.0% | Annotated bibliography does not provide the following: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered. Source selected is not appropriate. | Annotated bibliography includes the following: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered; however, it is unclear, lengthy, incomplete, or source selected is not scholarly. | Annotated bibliography includes the following: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered. Main idea is not expressed in a clear and concise manner, or explanation of why the article is scholarly is vague. | Annotated bibliography includes the following in a clear and concise manner: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered scholarly. | Annotated bibliography includes the following in a clear, thorough, and concise manner: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered scholarly. |
| Entrepreneurism | 25.0% | Annotated bibliography does not provide the following: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered. Source selected is not appropriate. | Annotated bibliography includes the following: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered; however, it is unclear, lengthy, incomplete, or source selected is not scholarly. | Annotated bibliography includes the following: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered. Main idea is not expressed in a clear and concise manner, or explanation of why the article is scholarly is vague. | Annotated bibliography includes the following in a clear and concise manner: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered scholarly. | Annotated bibliography includes the following in a clear, thorough, and concise manner: a brief description, main ideas, how it is relevant, and why it was considered scholarly. |
| Organization, Effectiveness, and Format | 25.0% |
| Mechanics of Writing (e.g., spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 15.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Maree29
Rubric_Print_Format5.xlsx
