| Course Code |
Class Code |
Assignment Title |
Total Points |
| ELM-200 |
ELM-200-O501 |
Personal and Social Development Scenarios |
100.0 |
| Criteria |
Percentage |
No Submission (0.00%) |
Insufficient (65.00%) |
Approaching (75.00%) |
Acceptable (85.00%) |
Target (100.00%) |
Comments |
Points Earned |
| Criteria |
100.0% |
| Scenario 1 |
15.0% |
Not addressed. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are inappropriate. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is ineffective Communication method is irrelevant and rationale is vague. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are plausible. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is adequate Communication method is basic and rationale is sufficient. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are appropriate. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is effective Communication method is relevant and rationale is suitable. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are insightful. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is innovative Communication method is creative and rationale is thorough. |
| Scenario 2 |
15.0% |
Not addressed. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are inappropriate. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is ineffective Communication method is irrelevant and rationale is vague. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are plausible. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is adequate Communication method is basic and rationale is sufficient. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are appropriate. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is effective Communication method is relevant and rationale is suitable. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are insightful. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is innovative Communication method is creative and rationale is thorough. |
| Scenario 3 |
15.0% |
Not addressed. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are inappropriate. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is ineffective Communication method is irrelevant and rationale is vague. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are plausible. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is adequate Communication method is basic and rationale is sufficient. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are appropriate. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is effective Communication method is relevant and rationale is suitable. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are insightful. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is innovative Communication method is creative and rationale is thorough. |
| Scenario 4 |
15.0% |
Not addressed. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are inappropriate. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is ineffective Communication method is irrelevant and rationale is vague. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are plausible. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is adequate Communication method is basic and rationale is sufficient. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are appropriate. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is effective Communication method is relevant and rationale is suitable. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are insightful. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is innovative Communication method is creative and rationale is thorough. |
| Scenario 5 |
15.0% |
Not addressed. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are inappropriate. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is ineffective Communication method is irrelevant and rationale is vague. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are plausible. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is adequate Communication method is basic and rationale is sufficient. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are appropriate. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is effective Communication method is relevant and rationale is suitable. |
Strategies to address issues within the scenario are insightful. Collaboration with families outside the classroom is innovative Communication method is creative and rationale is thorough. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
15.0% |
Not addressed. |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. |
Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. |
Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few are present. A variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech are used, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language. |
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
10.0% |
Not addressed. |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors are present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage |
100% |