Building Confidence in STEM Presentation

profilernixon@12345
Rubric_Print_Format465.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ECS-585 ECS-585-O500 Clinical Field Experience A: Math Lessons 50.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Problem Solving and Critical Thinking Skills 25.0% Not addressed. Reflection did not discuss how the lesson promoted problem-solving and critical thinking skills for the grade level. Reflection minimally discusses how the lesson promoted problem-solving and critical thinking skills for the grade level. Reflection clearly discusses how the lesson promoted problem-solving and critical thinking skills for the grade level. Reflection skillfully and concisely discusses how the lesson promoted problem-solving and critical thinking skills for the grade level.
The Prompted Importance of Communication as Part of Thinking Mathematically 25.0% Not addressed. Reflection does not discuss how the mentor teacher prompted the importance of communication as part of thinking mathematically. Reflection minimally discusses how the mentor teacher prompted the importance of communication as part of thinking mathematically. Reflection clearly discusses how the mentor teacher prompted the importance of communication as part of thinking mathematically. Reflection skillfully and concisely discusses how the mentor teacher prompted the importance of communication as part of thinking mathematically.
Enhancing Student Learning 25.0% Not addressed. Reflection does not explains what aspects of the planning or instruction of the math lesson you would augment to enhance student learning and why. Explanation is not supported with current and relevant research-based sources. Reflection minimally explains what aspects of the planning or instruction of the math lesson you would augment to enhance student learning and why. Explanation is ineffectively supported with current and relevant research-based sources. Reflection clearly explains what aspects of the planning or instruction of the math lesson you would augment to enhance student learning and why. Explanation is soundly supported with current and relevant research-based sources. Reflection skillfully and concisely explains what aspects of the planning or instruction of the math lesson you would augment to enhance student learning and why. Explanation is insightfully supported with current and relevant research-based sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 15.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language or word choice may be present. Sentence structure may not be varied. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 10.0% Not addressed. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors are present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%