| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ECS-590 | ECS-590-O500 | Clinical Field Experience C: Pre-Assessment Using Non-Standardized Assessments | 30.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: No Submission (0.00%) | 2: Insufficient (69.00%) | 3: Approaching (74.00%) | 4: Acceptable (87.00%) | 5: Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Field Experience Summary: Technology-based Assessment Choices | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Summary of technology-based assessment choices is insufficient, or technology selected is inappropriate for students. | Summary of technology-based assessment choices is lacking substantive detail, or technology selected may not be ideal for students. | Summary adequately describes developmentally appropriate and engaging technology-based assessment choices. | Summary comprehensively describes developmentally appropriate and engaging technology-based assessment choices. |
| Field Experience Summary: Technology-based Assessment Choices Rationale | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Summary poorly rationalizes technology-based assessment choices by including irrelevant details, or inappropriately or insufficiently addressing student needs. | Rationalization for technology-based assessment choices lacks sufficient detail and professionally-grounded reasoning, only vaguely focusing on student needs. | Summary soundly rationalizes technology-based assessment choices, generally focusing on student needs. | Summary convincingly rationalizes technology-based assessment choices, clearly focusing on student needs. |
| Field Experience Summary: Future Professional Practice Application | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Applications to future practice are incomplete, inappropriate, or unrelated to what was described in the summary. | Applications to future practice are unrealistic or underdeveloped. | Applications to future practice are sound, useful, and appropriate for students. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful, realistic, and clearly consider the needs of students. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
rnixon@12345
Rubric_Print_Format444.xlsx
