| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ECS-550 | ECS-550-O500 | Data Collection Tools Graphic Organizer | 50.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Data Collection Tools - Benefits [CEC 4.1; NAEYC 3b; InTASC 6(a), 6(k)] | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Graphic Organizer is underdeveloped, wholly inaccurate, or includes less than three tools. Benefits of tools are underdeveloped or inappropriate | Graphic Organizer describes three data collection tools, but descriptions are minimal and benefits are lacking sufficient detail. | Graphic Organizer soundly describes each tool and clearly outlines benefits of each. | Graphic Organizer thoughtfully describes each tool and outlines benefits of each with professionalism and insight. |
| Data Collection Tools - Drawbacks [CEC 4.1; NAEYC 3b; InTASC 6(a), 6(k)] | 15.0% | Not addressed. | The drawbacks of each data collection tool introduced is underdeveloped or inappropriate. | Graphic Organizer broadly presents drawback of each data collection tool. | Graphic Organizer clearly outlines drawbacks of each data collection tool | Graphic Organizer thoughtfully outlines drawbacks of each data collection tool presented with professionalism and insight. |
| Data Collection Tools ? Use in the Classroom | 20.0% | Not addressed. | The classroom use of each data collection tool is underdeveloped or inappropriate. | Graphic Organizer broadly outlines the classroom use of each data collection tool. | Graphic Organizer clearly outlines the classroom use of each data collection tool. | Graphic Organizer thoughtfully outlines the classroom use of each data collection tool presented with professionalism and insight. |
| Reflection [CEC 4.1; NAEYC 3b; InTASC 6(a), 6(k)] | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection unclearly supports thinking as to why chosen data collection tool would be used in future professional practice, or argument is inappropriate. | Reflection minimally explains why the data collection tool was selected for use in future professional practice. | Reflection provides a sound reasoning as to why chosen data collection tool would be used in future professional practice. | Reflection provides a compelling justification of why chosen data collection tool would be used in future professional practice. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Format and Documentation of Sources (layout, citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting and citation errors are present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style. Format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
rnixon@12345
Rubric_Print_Format4400.xlsx
