week 5 essay

profileMommia
Rubric_Print_Format4.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
PSY-362 PSY-362-O501 Dating Profile 60.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
Online Dating Profile 20.0% Online dating profile is missing. Online dating profile is vague and mostly complete. Online dating profile is complete. Online dating profile is complete and clear. Online dating profile is clear and concise.
Describe the social psychological theories of attraction reflected in online dating profiles 20.0% Description of the social psychological theories of attraction reflected in online dating profiles is missing. Description of the social psychological theories of attraction reflected in online dating profiles is vague and inconsistent. Description of the social psychological theories of attraction reflected in online dating profiles is complete. Description of the social psychological theories of attraction reflected in online dating profiles is complete and clear. Description of the social psychological theories of attraction reflected in online dating profiles is clear, concise and makes connections to research.
Describe at least three concepts related to mating and attraction used in online dating profiles 20.0% Description of at least three concepts related to mating and attraction used in online dating profiles is missing. Description of at least three concepts related to mating and attraction used in online dating profiles is vague and inconsistent. Description of at least three concepts related to mating and attraction used in online dating profiles is complete. Description of at least three concepts related to mating and attraction used in online dating profiles is complete and clear. Description of at least three concepts related to mating and attraction used in online dating profiles is clear, concise and makes connections to research.
Reflect on choices made in completing profile 20.0% Reflection on choices made in completing the profile is missing. Reflection on choices made in completing the profile is vague and inconsistent. Reflection on choices made in completing the profile is complete. Reflection on choices made in completing the profile is complete. Reflection includes why choices were made. Reflection on choices made in completing the profile concise. Reflection includes why choice were made and makes connections to social psychological concepts related to mating and attraction.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 10.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 10.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%