| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ECS-550 | ECS-550-O500 | Functional Behavior Assessment | 80.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Functional Behavior Assessment [CEC S4.4, NAEYC 3b; InTASC 6(b), 6(k)] | 35.0% | Not addressed. | Functional Behavior Assessment for the case study student is inappropriate or incomplete. | Functional Behavior Assessment for the student described in the scenario is lacking detail. Case study information and data were not adequately incorporated. | Functional Behavior Assessment is complete and relevant, clearly using case study information and data. | Functional Behavior Assessment is professional and comprehensively uses case study information and data. |
| Research-Based Student Interventions [CEC S4.5, NAEYC 3c; InTASC 2(b), 2(h), 6(l)] | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Research-based interventions for the case study student are inappropriate or incomplete. | Research-based interventions for the case study student are lacking clarity and definition, or are not ideal choices for the student. | Appropriate research-based interventions for the case study student described are clearly presented. | Exceptional, well researched interventions for the case study student are professionally presented. |
| Summary [CEC S4.5, NAEYC 3c; InTASC 2(b), 2(h), 6(l)] | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Summary for intervention choices in the Functional Behavior Assessment poorly explains how decisions support the development and learning of the case study student. | Summary for intervention choices in the Functional Behavior Assessment provides a marginal validation of how decisions support the development and learning of the case study student. | Summary for intervention choices in the Functional Behavior Assessment provides a sound reasoning of how decisions directly support the development and learning of the case study student. | Summary for intervention choices in the Functional Behavior Assessment provides a compelling justification of how decisions directly support the development and learning of the case study student. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Format and Documentation of Sources (layout, citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting and citation errors are present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style. Format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
rnixon@12345
Rubric_Print_Format331.xlsx
