Clinical Field ExperienceB

profilernixon@123
Rubric_Print_Format31.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ECS-550 ECS-550-O500 Clinical Field Experience B: Response to Intervention or Multi-Tiered System of Support 30.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
RTI or MTSS Interview Summary [CEC 4.8; NAEYC 3c, InTASC 2(a), 2(g), 6(c), 6(l)] 30.0% Not addressed. Weak summary, with little or irrelevant detail of RTI or MTSS interview content presented. Summary of RTI or MTSS interview content is broadly presented. Sound summary of RTI or MTSS interview content is provided, with appropriate detail. Summary of RTI or MTSS interview content is proficient and presents thoughtful, applicable details.
Interview and Future Professional Practice Reflection [CEC 4.8; NAEYC 3c, InTASC 2(a), 2(g), 6(c), 6(l)] 40.0% Not addressed. Vague or irrelevant reflection of interview and application to future professional practice is provided. Interview and future professional practice reflection is overly simplistic. Reflection of interview and application to future professional practice is sound and provides reference to support the premises made. Reflection of interview and application to future professional practice is thorough, with insightful reasoning.
Organization 10.0% Not addressed. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the summary is widely outside of the required word count. The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the required word count. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within a reasonable range of the required word count. The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the required word count.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 20.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%