| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| PSY-362 | PSY-362-O501 | Benchmark - Social Self | 70.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Describe the self-enhancement and self-verification motives for self-esteem. | 25.0% | Description of self-enhancement and self-verification motives for self-esteem is missing. | Description of self-enhancement and self-verification motives for self-esteem is vague and inconsistent. | Description of self-enhancement and self-verification motives for self-esteem is present. | Description of self-enhancement and self-verification motives for self-esteem is present and clear. | Description of self-enhancement and self-verification motives for self-esteem is clear, concise, and makes connections to research. |
| Discuss which motive (self-enhancement or self-verification) is most evident in the sites you viewed. | 25.0% | Discussion of which motive is most evident in sites viewed is missing. | Discussion of which motive is most evident in sites viewed is vague and inconsistent. | Discussion of which motive is most evident in sites viewed is present. | Discussion of which motive is most evident in sites viewed is present and clear. | Discussion of which motive is most evident in sites viewed is clear, concise, and makes connections to research. |
| Discuss if you think these online portraits of people are accurate. | 5.0% | Discussion if student believes online portraits of people are accurate is missing. | Discussion if student believes online portraits of people are accurate is vague and inconsistent. | Discussion if student believes online portraits of people are accurate is present. | Discussion if student believes online portraits of people are accurate is present and clear. | Discussion if student believes online portraits of people is accurate is clear, concise, and makes connections to research. |
| Explain if the prevalence of being exposed to social factors on social media influences individual behavior and the development of the social self, include how it does or does not influence the development of the social self. (C1.1) | 10.0% | Explanation of the prevalence of being exposed to social factors on social media influences individual behavior and the development of the social self, including how it does or does not influence the development of social self is missing. | Explanation of the prevalence of being exposed to social factors on social media influences individual behavior and the development of the social self, including how it does or does not influence the development of social self is vague and inconsistent. | Explanation of the prevalence of being exposed to social factors on social media influences individual behavior and the development of the social self, including how it does or does not influence the development of social self is present. | Explanation of the prevalence of being exposed to social factors on social media influences individual behavior and the development of the social self, including how it does or does not influence the development of social self is present and clear. | Explanation of the prevalence of being exposed to social factors on social media influences individual behavior and the development of the social self, including how it does or does not influence the development of social self is clear, concise, and makes connections to research. |
| Discuss the positive and negative aspects associated with social media sites. | 5.0% | Discussion of the positive and negative aspects associated with social media sites is missing. | Discussion of the positive and negative aspects associated with social media sites is vague and inconsistent. | Discussion of the positive and negative aspects associated with social media sites is present. | Discussion of the positive and negative aspects associated with social media sites is present and clear. | Discussion of the positive and negative aspects associated with social media sites is clear, concise, and makes connections to research. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Mommia
Rubric_Print_Format3.xlsx
