| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| CNL-501 | CNL-501-O502 | Recovery and Support Groups (Obj. 4.1) | 140.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Part One: Attending the Non-clinical Meeting | 30.0% | Essay omits or incompletely summarizes the non-clinical meeting attended.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Essay inadequately summarizes the non-clinical meeting attended, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. | Essay adequately summarizes the non-clinical meeting attended, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Essay clearly summarizes the non-clinical meeting attended, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay provides extra details of the Part One required particulars, such as general atmosphere of the meeting place, feeling for general attitudes of attendees, titles (if known) of key speakers.Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. | Essay expertly describes summarizes the non-clinical meeting attended, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay provides extra details of the Part One required particulars, such as general atmosphere of the meeting place, feeling for general attitudes of attendees, titles (if known) of key speakers. Provides introspection of how the contents of the attended meeting relate to general recovery/support philosophy, including references from the text and/or outside scholarly references.Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part Two: The Impact of Substance Use | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely describes the impact of a substance use disorders on a member’s/participant’s life problems.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Essay inadequately describes the impact of a substance use disorders on a member’s/participant’s life problems, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. | Essay adequately describes the impact of a substance use disorders on a member’s/ participant’s life problems, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Essay clearly describes the impact of a substance use disorders on a member’s/participant’s life problems, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. | Essay expertly describes the impact of a substance use disorders on a member’s/ participant’s life problems, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part Two: Two Recovery Goal Examples | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely describes two examples of how members/participants were engaged in their recovery goals.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Essay inadequately describes two examples of how members/participants were engaged in their recovery goals, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. | Essay adequately describes two examples of how members/participants were engaged in their recovery goals, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Essay clearly describes two examples of how members/participants were engaged in their recovery goals, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. | Essay expertly describes two examples of how members/participants were engaged in their recovery goals, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part Two: Two Specific Actions | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely describes two actions a counselor can take during the therapy session and related follow-up that can help someone with a substance use disorder to be successful.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Essay inadequately describes two actions a counselor can take during the therapy session and related follow-up that can help someone with a substance use disorder to be successful, but description is weak and missing support by observation. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. | Essay adequately describes two actions a counselor can take during the therapy session and related follow-up that can help someone with a substance use disorder to be successful, but description is limited and lacks support by observation. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Essay clearly describes two actions a counselor can take during the therapy session and related follow-up that can help someone with a substance use disorder to be successful, and description is strong with sound support by observation. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. | Essay expertly describes two actions a counselor can take during the therapy session and related follow-up that can help someone with a substance use disorder to be successful, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant support by observation. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part Two: One Specific Example to Help Overcome Self-Defeating Behaviors | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely describes one specific example of actions a counselor can take to help someone with a substance use disorder address self-defeating behaviors toward their recovery process. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Essay inadequately describes one specific example of actions a counselor can take to help someone with a substance use disorder address self-defeating behaviors toward their recovery process, but description is weak and missing support by observation. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. | Essay adequately describes one specific example of actions a counselor can take to help someone with a substance use disorder address self-defeating behaviors toward their recovery process, but description is limited and lacks some support by observation. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Essay clearly describes one specific example of actions a counselor can take to help someone with a substance use disorder address self-defeating behaviors toward their recovery process, and description is strong with sound support by observation. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. | Essay expertly describes one specific example of actions a counselor can take to help someone with a substance use disorder address self-defeating behaviors toward their recovery process, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant support by observation. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive, reflective of the arguments, and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Rachaelm1
Rubric_Print_Format3.xlsx
