| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| HCA-545 | HCA-545-O500 | Contemporary Health Care Issue | 65.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (79.00%) | 4: Good (87.00%) | 5: Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 80.0% |
| Major Financial and Physical Issues | 20.0% | Description of the major financial and physical issues of the selected health care issue is not included. | Description of the major financial and physical issues of the selected health care issue, including the plan to implement initiatives to address the issue, is incomplete or incorrect. | Description of the major financial and physical issues of the selected health care issue, including the plan to implement initiatives to address the issue, is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. | Description of the major financial and physical issues of the selected health care issue, including the plan to implement initiatives to address the issue, is complete and includes explanation and relevant supporting details. | Description of the major financial and physical issues of the selected health care issue, including the plan to implement initiatives to address the issue, is thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details. |
| Major Demographic Populations, Providers, and Regulatory Bodies Affected | 20.0% | Description of the major demographic populations, providers, and regulatory bodies affected by the selected health care issue is not included. | Description of the major demographic populations, providers, and regulatory bodies affected by the selected health care issue, including the plan to implement initiatives to address the issue, is incomplete or incorrect. | Description of the major demographic populations, providers, and regulatory bodies affected by the selected health care issue, including the plan to implement initiatives to address the issue, is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. | Description of the major demographic populations, providers, and regulatory bodies affected by the selected health care issue, including the plan to implement initiatives to address the issue, is complete and includes explanation and relevant supporting details. | Description of the major demographic populations, providers, and regulatory bodies affected by the selected health care issue, including the plan to implement initiatives to address the issue, is thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details. |
| Major Ethical Considerations From Christian Worldview Perspective (MC3) | 20.0% | Discussion of the major ethical considerations of the selected health care issue from a Christian worldview perspective is not included. | Discussion of the major ethical considerations of the selected health care issue from a Christian worldview perspective, including patient/family, patient care provider, and regulatory body perspectives, is incomplete or incorrect. | Discussion of the major ethical considerations of the selected health care issue from a Christian worldview perspective, including patient/family, patient care provider, and regulatory body perspectives, is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. | Discussion of the major ethical considerations of the selected health care issue from a Christian worldview perspective, including patient/family, patient care provider, and regulatory body perspectives, is complete and includes explanation and relevant supporting details. | Discussion of the major ethical considerations of the selected health care issue from a Christian worldview perspective, including patient/family, patient care provider, and regulatory body perspectives, is thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details. |
| Implementation Initiatives and Solutions for Addressing the Contemporary Health Care Issue | 20.0% | Discussion of the implementation initiatives and solutions for addressing the identified health care issue is not included. | Discussion of the implementation initiatives and solutions for addressing the identified health care issue, including how the minimum number of required solutions meet the needs of identified stakeholders, is incomplete or incorrect. | Discussion of the implementation initiatives and solutions for addressing the identified health care issue, including how the minimum number of required solutions meet the needs of identified stakeholders, is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. | Discussion of the implementation initiatives and solutions for addressing the identified health care issue, including how the minimum number of required solutions meet the needs of identified stakeholders, is complete and includes explanation and relevant supporting details. | Discussion of the implementation initiatives and solutions for addressing the identified health care issue, including how the minimum number of required solutions meet the needs of identified stakeholders, is thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 15.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 5.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 5.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 5.0% |
| Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 3.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 2.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Gentle
Rubric_Print_Format2assignment4.xlsx
