| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| NRS-428VN | NRS-428VN-O502 | Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation | 125.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (75.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (89.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 90.0% |
| Description of Community and Community Boundaries: (People, Geographic, Geopolitical, Financial, Educational Level, Ethnic, Phenomenological Features and Types of Interactions, Goals, Interests, Barriers, and Challenges, Including Social Determinates of Health) | 20.0% | Description of boundaries of community is omitted. | Description of community and boundaries is unclear or incomplete and missing one or more necessary components to give context to the community assessment. | Description of community and boundaries of community is complete. A brief description of all components is offered. | Description of community and boundaries of community is complete, and components of community functioning are discussed in sufficient depth. | Description of community is complete. Boundaries are described in great detail, distinguishing environmental boundaries, environmental relationships, and external systems that comprise the open, community system. |
| Summary of Community Health Assessment | 20.0% | Community assessment is omitted. | Community assessment is provided but discussion is vague or incomplete. | Community assessment is complete, and a synopsis of each functional health pattern (FHP) is included. | Nursing process and functional health patterns (FHP) are identified with clear indications for actual, at-risk, and potential for improved health. | Discussion of functional health patterns is clear, complete, and comprehensive, with indications for actual, at-risk, and potential diagnoses as well as recommendations for surveillance and preventive measures. |
| Identification of Issue That Is Lacking or an Opportunity for Health Promotion | 20.0% | Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is omitted. | Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is included but discussion is vague or incomplete | NA | NA | Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is effectively included. |
| Conclusion With Summary of Findings and Impressions of General Community Health | 15.0% | Conclusion is omitted. | Conclusion is incomplete or unclear. | Conclusion is complete, with general summary of findings. | Conclusion is clear, with a comprehensive discussion of findings and general health of the community. | Conclusion is comprehensive, with a detailed summary of key findings that explains general health of the community and offers rationale for recommendations. |
| Summary of Interview With Community Health/Public Health Provider | 15.0% | Summary table is omitted. | Summary table is incomplete or unclear. | Summary table includes all functional health patterns with adequate documentation. | Summary table is clear, with a detailed and comprehensive description of findings from an assessment of the chosen community. | Summary table is comprehensive, with a detailed description of findings, as well as actual, at-risk, and potential diagnoses and recommendations for surveillance and preventative measures. |
| Organization, Effectiveness, and Format | 10.0% |
| Layout | 5.0% | The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. | The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. | The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. | The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. | The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. |
| Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) | 5.0% | Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. | Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. | Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. | The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. | The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
SushmaB
Rubric_Print_Format2.xlsx
